Tuesday, 26 March 2013

MAX Contraction Training – 180 Degree Health

MAX Contraction Training – 180 Degree Health

Posted


In the modern world, people are looking for more and more efficient ways to exercise.  My own life is pretty atypical, but I’m spending time at my mom’s house right now so this week I can totally relate.  I mean, with my mom’s large television in front of me I too can scarcely find time for anything.  Even sleep!  I mean, I just had to watch the Nuggets lose to the Lakers the other day, even though I hate basketball, and could care less about either team.  But I had to watch something after a busy day of watching every single golf shot of Round 2 in the Player’s tournament, another sport and tournament I care nothing about.

I wish I was joking.  Oh, wait a second.  This post will have to wait until later.  Skip Bayless and Stephen A. Smith are talking about Tim Tebow’s dog…

Okay I’m back.  Looks like Tebow changed the name of his dog from Bronco to Bronx.  What were we talking about?  Oh yeah exercise. And by exercise, I mean actually doing something physically.  Not just watching other people do it on youtube.  Or watching people play sports on tv.  Or reading about exercise, heh heh.

Yes I’m making fun of our sedentary society, and myself for being part of it, but the modern human, ultimately, is looking for the greatest reward with the minimum amount of effort.  For everything – exercise included.

Looking at the big picture, we shouldn’t really be looking at exercise as something to spend as little time doing as possible.  If you are, your relationship with exercise is probably very disordered as discussed in this audio clip from long ago…

My concern with exercise, and the reason I discuss efficient ways to exercise, is the toll that it takes on the human body.  While we hear the praises of it based on statistical analysis (a flawed way of assessing whether something is good or bad – nothing can be filed into such black and white categories), exercise is very hard on a sick person’s body.  It can also prevent someone’s recovery from a suboptimal metabolism – the root of many health problems and the primary focus of 180DegreeHealth.

Mike Mentzer, a pioneer when it comes to the mindset of extracting the maximum amount of benefit from exercise while inflicting the least amount of damage (and possessor of quite a butt-tickler of a stache), constantly sought after ways to minimize the damage done to the body with exercise and maximize the ability to recover from hard exercise.  He was one of the first to truly think beyond the mind-numbing mindset of “exercise is good, so the more the merrier!”



“An ideal workout should… utilize a minimum of the body’s biochemical reserves… the routine must not be carried on so long or repeated so frequently that it depletes the body’s reserves in an attempt to compensate for the merely exhaustive effects of the workout with nothing leftover…” 
~Mike Mentzer

The two primary dangers of exercise (aside from injury) are intensity and duration.  It’s fair to say that the higher the intensity, the shorter the duration must be for the exercise to be safe, productive, and sustainable.  Likewise, the longer the duration, the lower the intensity must be.

Both high-intensity and long-duration exercises done at a much lower intensity have benefits.  What I like about low-intensity exercise is that it is enjoyable, you are typically doing a variety of activities in a variety of ranges of motion and moving your body physically for a large portion of the day (avoiding spending too much time sitting).  Recreational activities like sports, hiking, swimming, gardening, and similar things fit into this category.  But these activities probably aren’t going to have much of an impact on your overall physiology.

Let’s say you are in your 50’s and you are noticing your strength really declining quickly (my 50-something brother-in-law today told me he’s noticed that time off from exercise causes his strength to decrease much more quickly than it used to when he was younger).  Walking up stairs is getting really hard.  You have trouble just standing up from a chair.  You get worn out after 4 minutes of sex and have to switch positions.  You get winded just doing little things around the house, much less doing the things you used to.  Maybe your bone mass has decreased as well.

Crap, Ninja Warrior is on now.  I may have to postpone this post another day…

If you have some of those aforementioned issues, and you really want to get some of your youth and vitality back and slow down or even reverse part of the natural physical descent that takes place with aging…

High-intensity exercise of a short duration is generally much more effective than low-intensity exercise done for a long duration.  While a combination of both should probably be performed – there’s no doubt that you get more bang for your buck doing high-intensity exercise.  If you have trouble walking up the stairs, see how much easier it gets when you double your leg strength.  That may sound like a lofty goal, but it can be done, and be done, by most people, with a total of just a half hour of leg presses (spread out over several months).

That’s efficiency.  And the toll upon the body and the metabolism, as well as the total exposure to stress hormones (more or less the universal cause of degenerative disease), is small.
But generating intensity and truly performing productive muscular work that leads to big increases in strength requires some technique and some understanding.

We started out discussing Body By Science, a great primer on doing the most productive strength-training work with the least risk of injury or overtraining.  Each exercise is done at a slow tempo, taken to true muscular failure, and only repeated once.  1 set.  3-5 exercises. Once per week.  A 10-15 minute weekly time commitment.

We further discussed how to fatigue the muscle even more by really focusing on the negative portion of the exercise in a post on Eccentric Exercise.  The negative portion of an exercise – or where you are lowering the weight instead of raising it, tires long after you’ve reached total exhaustion on the positive phase of the exercise.  So exhausting the negative portion of the exercise is higher in intensity.
Today I thought it was worthy to bring up a couple of other major factors in achieving maximal intensity – or what you could consider maximum efficiency (most productivity in the least amount of time).

Co-author of Body By Science and close personal of friend of the late Mike Mentzer, John Little has also created MAX Contraction, yet another type of high-efficiency, high-intensity exercise.  It too, is a good form of exercise that is safe, effective, and very time efficient.  I haven’t read his book on the subject, but I assume from what I know that this type of exercise tries to capitalize on two basic fundamentals…

1)      Fatiguing your muscle in the strongest range of motion
2)      Fatiguing your static strength (holding the weight in place – neither up nor down)

With each basic movement – such as pushing let’s say, you have parts of the motion where you are stronger and parts of the movement where you are weaker.  If you are doing a pushup, it’s much harder to go from the floor to the halfway point than it is from the 2/3 point to a full plank position where your elbows are locked out.  You are stronger at the top of the movement than the bottom or middle range.  If you are doing regular repetitions, you must stop when the weakest link has become fatigued.  Yet you have lots of juice left in the stronger portions of the movement.  So you haven’t achieved full exhaustion.

The premise of MAX Contraction is holding weight in the strongest portion of any given exercise and exhausting your muscle in its strongest range – which takes it to a deeper level of exhaustion.  We will definitely discuss this deeper in future posts on the topic of exercise, as this principle can be used to develop tremendous strength and muscle density with minimal muscle growth (for those desiring that, and I suspect from a health and metabolism standpoint, creating greater muscle density and strength rather than mass is probably superior).

Likewise when you reach muscular failure pushing a weight, you still have strength to hold that weight in place for 10 seconds or longer.  This is your static strength, and it is greater.  So if you go until your static strength fails, you’ve taken your muscle to a greater level of challenge.  MAX Contraction takes advantage of these two simple principles to subject your muscle to a much greater challenge than just doing a regular repetition until you can’t perform any more.  This won’t trigger swollen muscles developed through sarcoplasmic hypertrophy like traditional weight training.  But it may have a superior impact on strength and metabolic health with less hormonal damage or taxation on your recuperative abilities than typical muscle-building training.

Anyway, the training is discussed in this really good interview and demonstration of the exercise.  If you are like me, and spend twice as much time watching exercise than actually performing it (and by twice I mean like 26 times), you should enjoy it.  (Embedding is disabled for this badboy, so you’ll have to watch it on youtube).

http://youtu.be/ViMeLXZslys

I wouldn’t do this type of exercise exclusively, but just be conscious about your static strength and how to take your muscle to a higher level of exhaustion by going to the point in your exercises where your static strength fails.  I often do a static contraction or two into my workouts, or just work it in as sort of a finishing move.  My favorite static hold of late has been doing holds with chin-ups – like what they made chicks do back in P.E.  I hold it as long as possible with my chin above the bar, and then try my best to perform a slow negative after my static strength reaches failure.  It’s tough, and an amazing exercise for the abdominals as well.  It’s much tougher than it sounds!

A quick summary of how the exercise is performed…
1)      Load up an exercise with a heavier amount than normal.
2)      Move the weight, with or without assistance, into the position where your strength is greatest.
3)      Hold it as long as you possibly can  – the more weight you use, the shorter that time frame will be, and heavier is better for strength development… Both John Little and his colleague Pete Sisco recommend using a weight that causes you to reach failure in just 5 seconds.

A single set with 4-8 exercises once per week, with minimal rest in between exercises, makes for the exact kind of exercise I’m talking about – high-intensity with very short duration.  Efficient, safe, and very productive.  If you are looking at maximum reward with minimum time commitment and minimum drain on your health and vitality – in other words, the most sustainable and productive long-term exercise, the concepts in MAX Contraction, Pete Sisco’s Train Smart and similar exercise movements like Body By Science may be of great help to you.

Okay, gotta go now.  There’s cycling on tv.  So I must now spend another many hours watching something I don’t care about.  Hope it’s over before Dancing with the Stars begins.  Modern life is so time-consuming!

Heavy Weights Low Reps – 180 Degree Health

Heavy Weights Low Reps – 180 Degree Health

Posted


I don’t have much time to post today, but I received an email from a girl just the other day, and she mentioned jumping back into Crossfit after resting and refeeding for about a month.  Not good.  She experienced major insomnia as so often happens when doing really grueling exercise, which seemed to only worsen as she continued.

Research and ideas I came across touting the benefits of high intensity interval training managed to seduce me a couple of years ago.  While it may be true that higher intensity exercise (like Crossfit or HIIT) yields certain benefits, the fact of the matter is that really hard, grueling exercise has some negatives too – and I just don’t find it very sustainable.  There’s only so many times that you can realistically motivate yourself to face a bout of exercise at your absolute cardiopulmonary threshold.  Even Dr. Mercola who had great results with it and began eagerly sharing information about it, eventually found that he couldn’t keep up with the routine.

Needless to say, in the new Diet Recovery that I’m currently finishing up, there is no talk of “MAXercise,” or pushing yourself to such an intense and uncomfortable place.  Rather, there is a focus on sustainability with exercise, and finding the minimum effective dose of exercise to continually make progress.  The combination of progress and sustainability is what actually takes someone to a really high level of strength and fitness and keeps them there - done with the minimum amount of wear, tear, struggle, and strain, which is even more important for someone with a history of a low metabolism and major dietary and weight cycling stresses than it is for an abnormal person.

If you are looking for a safe, but productive form of exercise to do while following the rest and refeeding strategies lined out in Diet Recovery, or when you feel like you are done with that phase, or even just in general if stumbling across this post through a Google search, try heavy weights with low reps.  Do a basic few exercises with a weight that is really hard for you to move – just a few reps, or even just holding the heavy weight in place (static holds/contractions).

In a 30-minute workout or less, without even getting winded, and doing it as infrequently as once every week or two, you can gain tremendous strength over time.  Interval training is time efficient as well, but it’s just too damn draining and grueling.  Doing heavy weightlifting with low reps?  Piece of cake, even more time efficient, and even more productive.  You can literally increase you strength by 50% or more in a year without ever getting out of breath.

This isn’t the only physical activity people should do of course.  We should all spend time on our feet, moving around, playing and enjoying life in physical ways.  But for those wanting to do some real training, and like that kind of thing, a sustainable and effective strength training program is a great thing to prioritize.

202 Responses to “Heavy Weights Low Reps”

    • cyndi
      Ohhhhhh great! I have been resting and trying to get my body temp up so I decded to try your “MAXercise”. Well, last night I had to urinate like a thousand times, worst sleep of my life, woke up in the middle of the night and literally could not sleep. This morning, i haven’t moved from my chair and am eating for heat and i’ve been able to pull up the temp just a tiny bit. I took two steps forward and two steps back i believe. Learned the hard way I guess…:( Can’t wait to read the second version as I have been playing around with it for about two weeks now and am just stunned.
      Reply
        • cyndi
          How many more BIG mistakes are we talkin….:) And when does the new edition come out?
          Reply
        • Reyaz
          Matt, that’s why you need to give this update FREE to those who purchased the original version. I know 99 cents is almost nothing, but it is a matter of principle….
          Reply
          • Matt Stone
            It’s not an update. It’s a completely different book rewritten from scratch. It just happens to have the same title. Originally I was going to title it something different. I still might, at least call it Diet Recovery 2.
            Reply
  1. Tyler
    Only hitting the gym once every week or two? Makes a gym membership sound less appealing to a poor college student. I think I’ll just find some heavy rocks and leave those in my backyard.
    Reply

Gaining Muscle Mass – 180 Degree Health

Gaining Muscle Mass – 180 Degree Health

Posted


I wrote about this topic a little over a year ago, as I was eager to share the results I got while doing Scott Abel’s Metabolic Enhancement Training (MET) while basically eating as many carbs as a I could.  It worked.  It was also totally and completely grueling and left me with some serious aches and feeling pretty burned out.  I knew from the beginning that MET was unrealistic for the vast majority of people.  It is complex, complicated, grueling, and, when performed as Scott Abel directs (75+ minutes 5 days/week), overwhelming and impractical.

Lately we have been discussing pancakes, pizza, ice cream, chips, and other highly palatable foods for raising metabolism.  And I have had dozens of people report very high temps (over 99F), often achieved from the 96′s, in as little as 2 weeks.  I think the Hot Chick’s Club has tripled since January.  But I really wanted to try this out for myself.  I have reservations about advocating overfeeding on these types of foods, for obvious reasons – the least of which is having all the health nerds of the world call me a douchey quack McFatty.  I actually kind of enjoy that part.

But I’ve eaten plenty of those type of foods over the past year and the only thing I’ve noticed is improvements in health – including even stronger, whiter teeth with no tooth sensitivity.  No bleeding gums anymore.  Chest pain has gone.  Pet allergies have improved (spent a couple hours in a house with 8 cats the other day without so much as a sniffle).  And I feel free.

I’ve watched a friend of mine stop having seizures, grow out cracked, mangled fingernails into nice, shiny pearls, and quickly overcome a serious oral infection that she’s sought medical treatment for 10 YEARS (it took only 4 weeks before her docs told her it was all cleared up).  Although she’s far from being in perfect health, these health improvements – enough to baffle the medical doctors treating these conditions, has been achieved on a diet built mostly around French toast, pizza, and Coca Cola.  The calorie was the missing link in this case.  And ”health foods” like fruits had to be eaten in moderation to avoid the episodes of frequent urination that coincide with the seizures.  We almost learned this one the hard way.

All that aside, even though I felt a little like Cartman during the whole ordeal, I wanted to try overfeeding specifically on these foods for myself - to satisfy my own curiosities.  I was also interested to see what doing some weight training while overfeeding would do to my body temperature, body composition, and how it would affect the metabolic rehab process.  Here is what I found…

As is well-known and understood, the calorie is the most important dietary factor when it comes to gaining muscle mass.  Eating hard - specifically of highly-palatable “unclean” foods (because it’s MUCH harder to achieve a calorie surplus eating whole foods) and doing some hard weight training (described later in this post), is a pretty unbeatable formula when it comes to strength and muscle development.  Here is a video of mine, plus two others, that speak to the importance of hitting the calories hard for gaining mass.  Screw Lyle McDonald.  If you want to gain mass, you are better off consulting with Ronald McDonald (no offense Lyle, just sacrificing your name for cleverness).
Muscle gain was obviously very rapid, and I gained substantial mass in all regions.  I tend to gain muscle much easier in the lower body than the upper body, but everything grew a lot during the first 6 weeks since I have been overfeeding and weight training.  Strength improvements were dramatic too.  Weights that felt heavy were light by the very next workout.  I’ve never experienced such rapid strength gain, and its actually got me quite enthused about continuing my weight training (unlike MET which, although it made me stronger and fitter, eventually made me contemplate suicide every time I was about to walk into the gym).   My training volume was extremely low by most standards too, and aches and pains that I had starting out have all lessened or gone away completely.

My Mass-Gaining Workouts

I have come to really appreciate simplicity, especially when it comes to dishing out something that a noob can go out and put into practice without being overwhelmed or intimidated with complexity.  So I split a full body routine into 4, 20-minute workouts.

Workout 1:  Squats and calves
Workout 2:  Chest and upper back (pushing and pulling)
Workout 3:  Deadlifts and core
Workout 4:  Shoulders and Lats (press up and pull down)

For each workout, I would perform as many sets of 8-10 repetitions as possible in a 10-minute window.  Each set would be taken close to failure, so a weight I could do for 10 reps in the first set would be too heavy to move by the 5th or 6th set.  In other words, I used lighter and lighter weight each set.  Rest periods were kept to 30-45 seconds or so in between sets.  This is important specifically for muscle growth, because you really don’t want to rest enough for your ATP to be fully replenished in between sets.  That’s great for strength development, but not muscle development which is not the same thing.  As discussed in and old post, low reps with heavy weights and lots of rest in between sets is best for strength gain.  Muscles grow in response to extreme energy and oxygen deprivation, which happens when you are breathing hard and fatigue your muscle until you can hardly move a pencil with it.  Higher reps (8-12+) with less rest in between sets works better for growth.

So, after 10-minutes was up, I would rest for a few minutes and repeat another 10-minute battle with a different body part – never more than two major muscle groups per workout.  Thus, my workouts were basically 2, 10-minute  ”drop sets” (sort of) per muscle group.  And I would get through my 4 workouts once every 10 days.  While 10 minutes per muscle group every 10 days may sound like nothing, in hindsight this was actually TOO MUCH.  5 minutes would have been plenty.  We’ll also talk about High Intensity Training and Body By Science next month, which utilize a similar style of training but cut the duration back to less than 2 minutes per week per body part.  For those that wish to exercise and gain muscle during RRARF, this is probably the best type of exercise.  I’m finding MAX interval training as described in Diet Recovery to actually be pretty metabolically-costly in terms of its body temperature lowering effect (according to individual reports).

The Verdict

Anyway, this load of training, as expected, did keep my body temperature a little bit lower.  I had pretty severe muscle soreness all the time in some body part.  My sleep suffered from the workouts as well (which adversely affects body temperature).  I’ve cut way back as I continue to eat as hard as possible until May, doing a more Body By Science-inspired weightlifting routine.

It’s hard to say what effect this exercise had on how much body fat I gained during overfeeding, but I don’t think it prevented much fat gain.  I still gained a pretty substantial amount of fat in addition to the muscle gains.  I do feel pretty damn good and can’t say there’s much of a reason for me to personally fear white flour, white sugar, or highly palatable “junk” like pancakes, pizza, burgers and fries, and ice cream.

For those interested most in body composition, this approach shouldn’t sound unfamiliar.  In fact, this is the STANDARD approach to body composition improvement amongst the bodybuilding elite – body composition improvement defined as a an increased ratio of muscle mass to body fat.  Muscle mass growth is extremely slow if you are not gaining a little body fat.  While gaining body fat, it’s virtually impossible not to gain lean mass, even if you aren’t even exercising.  And for some, a whole foods diet simply will not enable one to eat and metabolize enough calories for efficient growth.  Refined foods work better for that, and their “supranatural” properties probably can be used to our advantage – even with body composition.

And so, as always has been suggested by the smartest people in the fitness industry, if you want to look better – put all the emphasis on gaining muscle and increasing your metabolism first.  Then, as you lose fat, keep your weight training going and you’ll keep most of those muscle gains.  Most importantly, look at an effort to change your body composition as a long-term, cumulative effort.  Really changing your physique in a permanent way is, at minimum, a 1-2 year project (it’s pretty easy too I think, you just have to be patient and do it in the right sequence).  Gaining muscle mass and ramping up your body temperature/metabolism in the 98′s and 99′s (over 37C) is a huge asset - totally worth it in my opinion even if you do gain quite a bit of fat in the first few months.

Sunday, 24 March 2013

Sarcoplasmic or myofibrillar Muscle hypertrophy - Wikipedia

Sarcoplasmic or myofibrillar Muscle hypertrophy - Wikipedia

In the bodybuilding and fitness community and even in some academic books skeletal muscle hypertrophy is described as being in one of two types: Sarcoplasmic or myofibrillar.

According to this theory, during sarcoplasmic hypertrophy, the volume of sarcoplasmic fluid in the muscle cell increases with no accompanying increase in muscular strength, whereas during myofibrillar hypertrophy, actin and myosin contractile proteins increase in number and add to muscular strength as well as a small increase in the size of the muscle. Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy is characteristic of the muscles of certain bodybuilders while myofibrillar hypertrophy is characteristic of Olympic weightlifters.[17]

These two forms of adaptations rarely occur completely independently of one another; one can experience a large increase in fluid with a slight increase in proteins, a large increase in proteins with a small increase in fluid, or a relatively balanced combination of the two.

Tuesday, 19 March 2013

CrossFit - Fashion to Fitness (Laura Dziak)






Uploaded on 2 Feb 2012


When Laura Dziak first started CrossFit, she was mildly concerned about bulking up. What preoccupied her more, however, was doing a workout as RX'd. Today, she's gained a total of 15 lb. of muscle but is still a Size 0.

As a member of CrossFit Reston in Virginia, the former model ditched her old image for a new one.

"I would not say that being muscular or being fit was encouraged as a model," Dziak says. "It was all about being skinny, being a Size 0, double 0. That whole skinny-fat thing that exists where a girl is a Size 0 but she's got no tone on her was completely acceptable."

Not only has her body changed "for the better" since starting CrossFit, but Dziak also competed for the first time last year.

"Just daily activities, I feel so much more confident doing things, lifting things that I think the average girl would shy away from," she says.

Clarence Bass – 180 Degree Health

Clarence Bass – 180 Degree Health

Posted
In an ongoing conversation about what the best of the fitness and physique industry has to offer someone trying to lose body fat without sacrificing metabolic health, room needs to be made for Clarence Bass.

Bass is a famous ripped old dude, known for his multiple Over-40 Mr. America titles and maintenance of a very impressive physique all the way into his 70′s as shown in the photo (age 70).

Bass is an excellent example of someone who truly has achieved great leanness and has maintained that leanness his entire life – and done so without excessive strain, hunger, and so on.  His secret – a coarse, low-calorie density whole foods diet of “coarse,” and more or less allowing the weight to come off naturally by eating to appetite of a whole foods diet (high-carb/low-fat relatively speaking) while doing a lot of exercise (but nothing absurd – his exercise routine includes a couple of 20-minute aerobic intervals per week, a couple of leisurely hikes, and two full-body weightlifting sessions).

Although Bass should not be worshipped for his appearance of health – he has had many health problems recently including hip replacement, osteoarthritis, and hypertriglyceridemia (I probably would too if I consumed soy milk, skim milk, and a peanut butter sandwich every day and fruit with every meal), clearly he has some secrets to share.  His main secret, as you can read about in this online article, is simply eating a nutritious whole foods diet and being very patient with the weight loss – losing no more than a couple of pounds per month.

But as you can see from the compilation of quotes below, his philosophy is very much in line with that promoted by 180 and other 180 favorites like Jon Gabriel.  In short, if you are hungry and deprived, impatient, and you don’t eat real, whole, nutritious food most of the time - you will fail.

These are all themes of healing the metabolism, regaining lost health, and pursuing any health and physical appearance goal as lined out in this eBook DIET RECOVERY.

Anyway, here’s some words of wisdom from this largemouth Bass (the dude writes almost as much as I do) from his most recent book, Great Expectations… Emphasis on certain lines by me:

“…it’s not a good idea to limit the quantity of food you eat. Forcing yourself to stop eating before you’re full and satisfied doesn’t work very well. My observation is that few people can do it for long, and it’s not necessary anyway. As explained in my earlier books, eating a balanced diet of mostly whole foods will usually put your weight on a downward path. You don’t have to worry about restricting the amount you eat, because you become full before exceeding your calorie needs.”

p. 87

“Some of you, especially new readers, may be wondering why a guy interested in lifetime leanness would eat calorie-dense nut butter. The answer is simple and lies at the very core of my diet philosophy. I like nut butter, and it’s a bad idea to deprive yourself of foods you enjoy… Diets based on denial are psychologically flawed… It’s human nature to crave what you can’t have, and craving usually spells doom for dieters. I don’t have cravings – because I don’t deny myself foods such as nut butter.”

p. 98

“My dieting philosophy is that I don’t believe in dieting. I don’t diet in the normal sense of the word, ever, even when peaking… Dieting conjures up thoughts of hunger and deprivation. Dieting doesn’t work, because it makes people uncomfortable and unhappy. I believe the key to permanent body fat control is eating satisfaction. There’s no need to eat foods you don’t like – even when peaking – and there’s no need to ever leave the table feeling hungry.”

p. 104

“Severe dieting (or starvation) causes the body to produce more of the enzymes responsible for depositing fat. These fat-depositing enzymes create a tendency to get fat. Severe dieting also causes a slowdown in metabolism. This isn’t just a theory. It has happened to me on several occasions. Cutting calories too severely caused me to lose weight but gain fat. On one occasion, I lost 5.6 pounds, and my body fat went up. I lost a little over 6 pounds of muscle and gained a pound of fat. Not good!”

p. 141


“Unexplainable” Fat Loss Plateaus… Explained! | Burn The Fat Blog - Tom Venuto.

“Unexplainable” Fat Loss Plateaus… Explained!
| Burn The Fat Blog - Tom Venuto.


Fat loss plateaus and lack of progress are always frustrating. What makes it utterly maddening is when you feel like you’re putting in a superhuman effort in the gym and reducing calories, but still making no progress. At this point, I usually see two unfortunate things happen: The first is a knee-jerk “blame the fat on something else” reaction. Usually, bad genetics or a thyroid problem… but whatever it is, it’s definitely “not your fault.” The second is the tendency to deny the calories in versus calories out equation. “I’m hardly eating anything and I’m not losing weight, so it CAN’T be calories, it MUST be something else!” Carbs are the usual scapegoat.

dont_shoot_your_scale.jpg
Why do so many people hit fat loss plateaus that they can’t explain, leading them to question themselves, their plan and even the basic principles of energy balance?

The frustrations and complaints about “inexplicable” progress plateaus come in many forms, but one question recently posted in the Burn The Fat Member’s discussion forums was an especially good summary of the way many people feel exasperated about this:

Dear Tom: “I always hear about the need for a calorie deficit for losing fat. But in my experience, that is not always true. I understand about calories in versus calories out, but when you are in real life with real people, sometimes things become more complicated than they are on paper don’t they? I just wanted to open a debate that at some point, the body will adapt to a deficit and the weight does not go down even if we are in a calorie deficit. And if this adaptation takes place, is it even possible for any person to get really lean like you, or at least in the 6-7% body fat range? What if his genetics are so bad that no matter what he does, the fat stays there, and at the end, there is no other way than to try things like liposuction? There are cases where women hardly eat anything and they still are at the same weight, even if they train. Why? This seems so unfair.” 
It’s true that the theoretical (on paper) calorie math and your real world fat loss results don’t always seem to jive, but the fact is, you will ALWAYS lose weight in a calorie deficit. There are at least a half a dozen explanations for seemingly unexplainable weight loss plateaus. I will explain them all below…

Body composition improves but body weight doesn’t change much

First, it’s important to remember the difference between weight loss and fat loss, which can only be revealed with repeated body composition tests. With this distinction made, it would be slightly more accurate to say that a calorie deficit always causes energy to be withdrawn from body stores, but there may not always be an immediate and significant decrease in body weight.

You could lose body fat, which would show up visually and through body fat testing, but your scale weight may not change. This could be due to water retention or an increase in lean body mass (LBM). Sometimes you don’t notice or appreciate slow but steady improvements in body composition, especially when it’s masked by fluctuating water weight or increased in LBM.

If you’re focusing on the scale as your only criterion of success, that alone can be a great cause of confusion and frustration over short-term results.

Solution: weigh yourself and measure body composition over an extended period of time and track your results on a progress chart so you can see the trend over time.

Inter-individual variation in basal metabolic rate

Second, the calorie formulas we use to establish your basal metabolic rate (BMR) are estimations. I’ve found the Katch-Mcardle and Harris benedict equations for BMR/TDEE remarkably accurate and match up to real world expenditure the majority of the time.

However, BMR can vary from one individual to the next. According to a study published in the British Journal of Nutrition (Bader), the majority of the variance in BMR can be explained by age, gender and lean body mass (more LBM = higher metabolism), leaving only 19% of the variance unexplained. This unexplained variance is thought to be due to composition of the LBM (muscle vs organ mass), genetic factors and thyroid hormone.

One study showed up to a 25% variance in BMR that couldn’t be explained by body weight, body comp, age or gender. However, this finding was a rare exception. The body of research on the subject says that inter-individual BMR variability in healthy humans is small – usually in the range of a 3% to 8% difference from person to person (Donahoo).

If BMR could vary significantly from what we calculate using the BMR formulas, that’s another explanation for why the results don’t seem to jive sometimes. It also provides one more explanation for the naturally lean ectomorph and the naturally plumper endomorph. This doesn’t mean that calories don’t count. It means some people burn fewer calories at rest than others the same body size.

Calorie calculation formulas may be inaccurate for some populations and errors can made when using any calorie formula



Third, those same calorie formulas we use to establish BMR, we also use to establish total daily energy expenditure (TDEE). Again, these calorie formulas are estimations. In fact, the activity multiplier you use to produce TDEE from BMR is very much a guess.

In some individuals, particularly overweight men and women, the calorie formulas may overestimate your TDEE by as much as 10-15%. Some experts have suggested that different calorie formulas such as the Owen or Mifflin equations be used to accommodate for this potential margin of error or that population-specific equations be used.

It would be nice to get an accurate calorie estimation right from the start. Fortunately, you can easily reconcile between theoretical (on paper) calorie needs and actual calorie needs with weekly progress tracking and a good feedback loop system as found in Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle (BFFM). This way, the skinny ectomorph can still figure out the appropriate surplus and gain muscle and the endomorph can still achieve a deficit and cut fat.

Under-estimation of food intake and over-estimation of activity

Fourth, almost everyone underestimates their food intake. The famous New England Journal of Medicine study (Lichtman) is the classic example, where women who swore they were “diet resistant” and had thyroid problems were actually underestimating their food intake by 47% and overestimating their calories burned by 51%.

Some of them were eating one thousand calories more than they thought they were! Ironically, it was these women who were complaining the most about being genetically or hormonally cursed! While some people have thyroid problems or other legitimate medical issues which can contribute to difficulty losing weight, in most cases, there are other, more mundane, yet overlooked explanations for lack of fat loss.

To avoid this calorie miscalculation conundrum, the best plan is to educate yourself about the calorie contents of foods you eat regularly, work off a menu on paper and weigh your food. Do this until you have a good grasp on calories and then do it again any time you hit a plateau.

For more information on counting / journaling vs guesstimating/intuitive eating see: From calorie clueless to calorie competent.

Reduced calorie needs after weight loss

Fifth, it’s true that your body adapts to caloric restriction – that’s the nature of the human organism – striving to maintain homeostasis and prolong survival during starvation. However, some of the decrease in energy expenditure during dieting has nothing to do with an adaptive decrease in metabolism or “starvation mode”, it has to do with having a smaller body after weight loss.
This will only click for you if you see an example with real-world numbers:

Kevin is a 40-year old active male, 5 feet 8 inches tall and 235 pounds. If you run his numbers through our calorie calculators, his maintenance level is about 3200 calories per day. With a 20% deficit, which is fairly conservative and should not cause undue metabolic slowdown, he would want to eat 2600 calories per day to lose weight.

Suppose he successfully loses 50 pounds and becomes a lean 185 pounder. But then Kevin wants to knock off the last 10 pounds so he can be “ripped!” Now that he weighs 185 pounds, if you run his calorie calculations again you see that…

The math equation has changed!

Kevin is a smaller guy now, so he needs fewer calories. At 185, his maintenance level is now only 2800 a day. He’s burning FOUR HUNDRED CALORIES a day less than when he started.
If he keeps eating the way he did when he was a bigger guy, he will hardly lose any weight because he doesn’t need that many calories to sustain his weight anymore!

Suppose Kevin also forgets to report a measly 200 calories per day – his deficit is gone! It’s not that he isn’t losing fat in a deficit – he LOST his deficit. So his weight loss stops, even though he hasn’t changed anything from his original diet plan.

Therefore, his “human nature” tendency is to blame it on the diet not working (moving on to the next “diet of the month”). Or it must be a hormonal problem, genetics, or this whole calories in – calories out thing is wrong.

The energy balance equation is always with us, but ENERGY BALANCE IS DYNAMIC! This means your calorie needs can change based on your body size, activity level and countless other factors. If you fail to adjust your caloric intake and expenditure in real time to accommodate for your continuously changing energy needs, you’re likely to struggle with plateaus and be never-endingly perplexed about their cause.

Metabolic adaptation to dieting (aka “adaptive thermogenesis”)

Sixth, when you’re in a calorie deficit, your metabolic rate can slow down beyond what can be accounted for by the reduction in body weight. This is called adaptive thermogenesis. Incidentally, this is only one part of the starvation mode. Other components of the starvation response include a spontaneous decrease in non-exercise activity (NEAT) and an increase in appetite (there are behavioral changes, not just metabolic ones).

Extensive research has documented the drop in metabolism that occurs from calorie restriction, especially if it’s prolonged and severe. Most studies say adaptive thermogenesis can account for an additional 5-10% decrease in metabolism. However, one recent study (Tremblay) showed a shocking 30.9% drop in metabolism.

This variation may be due to the severity of the diet, but might be explained at least partly by hereditary factors. It’s totally possible that some individuals, (and to keep this in tune with BFFM, we shall broadly call them endomorphs – those with not so great genetics for fat burning), might see enough drop in metabolism with dieting to really slow down fat loss a lot.

This doesn’t mean the laws of thermodynamics are not operating — it means some people are burning fewer calories than they think they are. This could lead to a lot of frustration for dieters who don’t realize what’s really going on.

A diet break of 7 days (or longer) at maintenance or a carb cycling (re-feeding) strategy would help a lot to fix up the adaptive drop and get metabolism back up to speed.

Good nutrition practices in general such as those explained in the Burn the Fat, Feed The Muscleor the Body Fat Solution programs can help minimize this metabolic adaptation in the first place (conservative calorie deficits, proper protein intake to maintain LBM, training, etc).

The right question and the wrong question

If you were losing weight but your weight loss has stopped completely, you’ve lost your caloric deficit for one or more of the reasons listed above. The question to ask then, is NOT “what if a calorie deficit doesn’t work,” but “why did I lose my caloric deficit?”

I don’t mean to downplay how complex your body’s weight-regulating mechanism, metabolism and neuro-endocrine systems really are. Obesity is the simplest problem known to humankind when you consider that obesity is caused by an energy imbalance. But at the same time it’s the most complex problem known to humankind when you consider how many factors can contribute to that energy imbalance. Dozens? Hundreds? Maybe thousands?

There are many medical and health factors that can influence fat loss. These conditions are beyond the scope of this article and could be explored with a medical doctor or clinical professional. However, even in these clinical cases, you would invariably find that the energy balance equation is affected in some way, so in the end, it’s still calories in versus calories out.

For example, certain conditions may decrease BMR, exercise thermogenesis or non-exercise thermogenesis (energy output) or they may increase appetite (energy input). In the end, regardless of whether you suspect it’s hormones, prescription drugs, digestive disorders or a metabolic problem, it all comes full circle to thermodynamics anyway.

However, there’s one last factor to consider – nutrient partitioning – which refers to where energy is pulled from and where it is stored when you are in a deficit or surplus, respectively.

Beyond Calories in Versus Calories Out: Energy Partitioning

Suppose you DO have a calorie deficit. You are going to withdraw energy from body stores. But are you guaranteed to draw all that energy from body fat? No. If your hormones are out of whack, and you are stressed, overtrained and sleep deprived, or if you don’t have mesomorph genetics, you could lose much of that weight in muscle.

And, if you’re in a surplus, are you guaranteed to gain all the weight in muscle? Of course not. As we all know too well, excess food will go into fat storage. If you’re doing resistance training, then a small surplus will hopefully be directed into building some muscle. This partitioning process is influenced by many factors, including training, nutrition, lifestyle, hormones and genetics.

Mesomorphs are genetically gifted in the partitioning department – as long as the nutrition and training are in place, mesomorphs seem to partition all of the surplus straight into muscle tissue. Even with optimal training and nutrition, the endomorphs seem to partition half of the surplus right into fat!
By now, everything should be coming into focus. Fat loss is a complex neuro-endocrine process. Yes genetics and hormones are involved. Yes, body composition changes don’t end with calories in versus calories out – there’s also nutrient partitioning to consider, and that can affect not just whether you lose or gain weight, but what kind of weight you lose or gain.

People are making a huge mistake when it seems like the calorie numbers don’t jive, and they assume it’s ALL genetics, ALL hormones, ALL health problems or worst of all, that the calorie balance model of weight loss is wrong. Even though genetics, hormones, etc. are contributing factors, at the end of the day, the laws of thermodynamics and the calorie balance equation are always there.

Can anyone get lean or are some people stuck with genetically dictated body fat?

What are the implications of all this to a person’s ultimate progress? Is it possible for anyone to get “ripped” or for a guy to hit 6% body fat if the factors above are working against him?

I believe that anyone can reach their ideal body composition goals. I even believe that most men could get as lean as single digit body fat, and women could reach the low to mid teens in body fat, if that is their goal. But the journey will undoubtedly be harder for some than others. That may not seem fair, but who ever said life was supposed to be fair? Besides, for every inherent weakness, we have an inherent strength. For every weakness we overcome, we develop a new strength.

Excess body fat is genetically influenced but the good news is, genetics are only one factor. Obesity genes do not express themselves and hormones do not run amok unless you succumb to the”obesogenic environment” and eat excessive amounts of food, eat unhealthy junk, live a sedentary lifestyle and allow temptations and negativity to drag you down.

You didn’t get to choose your genetics, but you do get to choose your attitude and your behavior.

- Tom venuto, author of:
Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle:
(Fat burning secrets of the world’s leanest physique athletes)

The Body Fat Solution:
(the mental, social and emotional side of losing fat and staying lean for life)

join_us_on_facebook.jpg
References:
Bader N et al. Intra and inter-individual variability in resting energy expenditure in healthy male subjects – biological and methodological variability of resting energy expenditure. Br J Nutr. Nov;94(5):843-9. 2005
Donahoo, W et al, Variability in energy expenditure and its components, Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care, 7:599-605, 2004.Dept of medicine, University of Vermont.
Doucet E, et al. Evidence for the existence of adaptive thermogenesis during weight loss. British Journal of Nutrition, 85, 715-723. 2001. Laval University, Ste-Foy, Quebec
Tremblay A, Chaput, JP, Adaptive reduction in thermogenesis and resistance to lose fat in obese men, Br J Nutr, 102(4): 448-492, 2009. Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.
Lichtman S, et al, Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects. New England Journal of Medicine, Vol 327, pg 1893-1898. Department of Medicine, St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY.
Müller MJ, Bosy-Westphal A, Kutzner D, Heller M. Metabolically active components of fat-free mass and resting energy expenditure in humans: recent lessons from imaging technologies.Obes Rev. 2002 May;3(2):113-22.
Ravussin E, Bogardus, C. relationship of genetics, age and physical fitness to daily energy expenditure and fuel utilization, Am J Clin Nutr, 49: 968-975. 1989. National Institutes of Health and Arizona State University.

About Tom Venuto


Tom Venuto is a lifetime natural (steroid-free) bodybuilder, fitness writer and author of Burn The Fat, Feed The Muscle (e-book) and the national bestseller,The Body Fat Solution. Tom has appeared in The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Huffington Post, Oprah Magazine, Muscle & Fitness magazine, Men’s Fitness Magazine, as well as on dozens of radio shows including Sirius Satellite Radio, ESPN-1250 and WCBS. Tom is also the founder and CEO of the premier fat loss support community, the Burn The Fat Inner Circle

Moving Up The Leanness Levels | Critical MAS

Moving Up The Leanness Levels | Critical MAS
 

In the post Leanness Defined, I went over the 4 Levels of Leanness defined by Christian Thibaudeau and Chris Shugart. I also added a level. They are:
  • Level 0 – You are mostly lean, but your abs arent quite flat.

  • Level 1 Flat stomach with no ab definition.

  • Level 2 Level 1 + some upper ab definition.

  • Level 3 Level 2 + lower ab definition.

  • Level 4 Level 3 with deep cuts and dry (no water weight)

Moving to Level 1 Leanness
This is the most straight forward. As you get leaner you will see everything tighten up. I was at Level 0 Leanness from basically the 9th grade until 2 years ago. In order of importance, here are the steps I took to get to to Level 1 Leanness.

  1. Reduced carbohydrate intake. Cut the sugar, bread and alcohol.

  2. Cooked my own meals.

  3. Weekly Intermittent Fasting.

  4. Weight training.
I was already doing the weight training, so really it was the first three items on the list that made the most difference. Note that nowhere on the list did I say go jogging, biking or spinning. The role of exercise in fat loss is way over stated. You are far better off spending your time in the kitchen cooking. Lift something heavy for 20 minutes a week and then focus your effort on food.


Moving to Level 2 Leanness
Going from Level 1 to Level 2 is like flying a plane in a storm. You can’t see where you are, so you have to trust your instruments. I’d like to quote Canada K, who I introduced in the post 17 Lessons For Fat Loss. He refers to this period as the Fat Loss Dead Zone.

Once you slide below 15%, the returns really diminish. You can lose a boatload of fat and it seems invisible. Its not until you get below 10%, or even 8%, where abs start to appear, where your waistline starts to get really tight, and where veins really start to show up.
So basically, there is this giant dead zone in the middle where youre making real gains but theyre incredibly unsatisfying. You must hang in there anyway. If you dont, youll never be lean.

This was an important lesson for me to learn. Going from Level 0 to Level 1 is highly rewarding. Every month you get a little but leaner and your clothes feel a little looser. This isn’t true for the journey from Level 1 to Level 2 Leanness. You’ll start to doubt your plan and be tempted to try new tricks, but patience is rewarded if your plan is solid. One day you’ll see your upper abs. Although I followed the same core principles as stated in the Moving to Level 1 Leanness, I added a few to assist with the process.

  1. Improve Omega 3- Omega 6 ratios. I only eat 100% grass pastured animals or seafood and I stopped consuming seed oils.

  2. More Sleep

  3. Gut Flora Improvements

  4. Cold Weather Training
Omega 3 fat cells are elongated and flexible, which places the hormone receptors on the exterior of the cell facing outward. This allows them to interact with hormones that trigger fat loss. Omega 6 fat cells are less flexible and have the hormonal receptors facing inward, which makes fat loss more difficult. Fixing your n-3 ratios is not something you can do overnight. It can take over 2 years to make the correction. Restaurants are notorious for using factory farm meat cooked in seed oils. You’ll need to source and cook your own food.

I reduced my caffeine intake so I am now sleeping a 8+ uninterrupted hours a night. Sleep helps you target fat loss over lean muscle. When I lived in DC, I would wake up at 4:45 AM and go to the gym. Sleep deprived and tired, I would eat carbs all day. I was never in worse shape.
Improving your gut flora can help you lean out. From the excellent post A healthy gut is the hidden key to weight loss by the Healthy Skeptic:

Other studies have shown that changes in the gut flora can increase the rate at which we absorb fatty acids and carbohydrates, and increase the storage of calories as fat. This means that someone with bad gut flora could eat the same amount of food as someone with a healthy gut, but extract more calories from it and gain more weight.

What have I been doing to improve my gut flora? Eating raw kimchi almost daily.
I have no way to measure the effect of cold weather training, but since it has become a daily part of my life, I feel I need to include it on the list.


Moving to Level 3 Leanness
I have yet to hit Level 3 Leanness. This is the stubborn fat. It has been camped out there for decades and it doesn’t want to leave. I don’t expect it to go easily. I mostly believe that Level 3 Leanness will come by following the same strategies I used to get this far. I’ll be patient and keep plugging away.
Soon I will be posting the winter version of Fall Strategies For Nutrition and Fitness. I believe winter is the optimal season for fat loss.


Moving to Level 4 Leanness

That topic is covered in detail in the article Shredded in 6 Days by Christian Thibaudeau and Chris Shugart.


Last Words

This is just a reminder that I am not a certified personal trainer or nutritionist. I’m just a hobbyist in the art of physique hacking. There are many paths to leanness. This post details what has worked for me.

You Are Your Own Gym | Critical MAS

You Are Your Own Gym | Critical MAS

You absolutely do not need a gym to gain strength. This book is full of exercise ideas that only require your own body weight.

You Are Your Own Gym: The Bible of Bodyweight Exercises

You Are Your Own Gym: The Bible of Bodyweight Exercises by Mark Lauren does a good job illustrating many different exercises one can do one your own without expensive gym equipment.

The book is selling right now for $11. Even if you got bored with body weight exercises after a month, you’ll be hard pressed to find a gym with a monthly fee that low.

The book lists 125 exercises starting on page 53. The text prior to this section is not essential to getting started. Not every exercise is equal. Some are heavy hitters, like the push-up and some of the squat variations. I like how he mentions slowing down the movements can increase the intensity.

However, I wouldn’t take his advice to use unstable platforms to increase difficulty, as I think the risk of injury would increase without a corresponding increased reward. If you get this book and start experimenting with the exercises, use your best judgement on the safety of the movement. Doing a push-up is safe. Jumping up onto a pile of boxes is only safe if the boxes remain stable as you successfully land on them (p110).

If you are just looking for a no nonsense safe workout with minimal exercises, then I would recommend the plan in the book HillFit by Chris Highcock or my less detailed outdoor HIT workout. If you want more ideas, especially if you are designing a Tabata or another strength interval workout, pick up a copy of You Are Your Own Gym. Just use your best judgement when selecting exercises. Pick the ones that don’t increase safety risk as fatigue sets in.

Clarence Bass: at 75 and 65 years of age


          
                                      

Clarence Bass: Pictorial Training History

http://www.agelesstimeless.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/262.jpg

Clarence at 75



Clarence at 70



     
Still Ripped at 65

          




       More photos at 65    


      
 
For more detailed information on Clarence's background (with a terrific ab shot) :
GO BIO

Peak Shape - at 60: Clarence Bass

Peak Shape - at 60

me - at 60!

Don't Overtrain

People are incredulous when I tell them I do only two workouts a week, a whole-body weight session and a very hard aerobics session lasting about 30 minutes. (I also walk for an hour or so on four other days, to burn extra calories and speed recovery.) Even my brother-in-law, who runs long distance to control his weight, asked, "Why so little?" My lifelong friend Carl Miller, a former U.S. Olympic Weightlifting Team coach and an excellent lifter in his own right, said, "Frankly, I didn't believe you."
Well, it's true. I've been doing weights on Sunday (two hours or less) and aerobics on Thursday for about a year now. I'm not claiming that twice a week is best for everyone - there is probably no one best training schedule, certainly not for everyone - but it has worked wonderfully well for me.
I believe most people, especially bodybuilders, err on the side of overtraining.

As I confessed in Ripped 2, I overtrained for years. I simply didn't understand the importance of rest. George Sheehan, the famous runner-doctor-philosopher (God rest his soul), perhaps said it best: "The body can be trained for greater performance by induced stress. But the amount of stress and the time allowed for recovery are critical to the success of the process." Like Dr. Sheehan, when it comes to training, I've come to appreciate the wisdom in the saying, "less is more."

As I've explained before, in my books and most recently in the FAQ on this site about Mike Mentzer's new book Heavy Duty II, I've been experimenting for years with longer rest periods between workouts. Mentzer's claim that his clients gains soared when he switched them from training every two or three days to every four or five days (Mike says, "Decomposition doesn't even start after a two-week layoff") prompted me to extend my rest periods to 3 days after weight sessions and 2 days after hard aerobics.

I got the idea of different recovery periods after weights and aerobics from Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky, Ph.D., the famed Soviet sports scientist who is now a professor at Penn State. In his book, Science and Practice of Strength Training, (Human Kinetics, 1995) Zatsiorsky points out that "fatigue effects from different types of muscular works are specific." He says that means you might not be sufficiently recovered to repeat a heavy strength workout, but you may be well recovered for a hard aerobics session. I found that's true.

By Thursday, after an intense Sunday lifting session, I'm not ready for another heavy strength workout, but I am ready for a great aerobics workout. And with two more days rest I'm fully recovered to enthusiastically launch into another heavy resistance session.

That's how my Sunday-Thursday training plan came into being. I also discovered that Mentzer is right about no decompensation even after two weeks. My weight sessions are divided into an "A" workout and a "B," with each being repeated every two weeks. For example, I do the power snatch and squat one week and the power clean and deadlift the next.

This worked great. My strength steadily improved even though my bodyweight was dropping. In the eleven months leading up to the photo session, you could count my bad workouts on the fingers of one hand. My training diary is full of comments such as "Great Workout," "Excellent Session," "Almost Perfect!" I'm sticking to my twice a week schedule.
Twice-a-week training definitely works.

One Work Set Only


One-set-only training is controversial, not only among bodybuilders, but in the academic world as well.
"Just one set of each strength exercise, correctly done twice a week, is generally enough to increase strength significantly." commented the editors of Physician and Sportsmedicine (February, 1997).
"Monumental misinformation," Howard G. Knuttgen, Ph.D. of University Park, Pennsylvania, fired back. According to Dr. Knuttgen, the correct prescription for active adults is "2 or 3 sets repetition maximum per session for each muscle group" done "3 to 4 sessions per week." (PSM, May 1997) But that wasn't the end of it.

Dr. Ralph N. Carpinelli, who teaches the neuromuscular aspects of strength training at Adelphi University, took up Dr. Knuttgen's challenge, in Richard Winett's Master Trainer (February 1998). "There is no scientific evidence, nor is there any physiological basis, that would support the superiority of multiple sets," wrote Dr.Carpinelli. As a matter of fact, continued Carpinelli, "Theoretically, as people become stronger and wish to attain maximal increases in strength and hypertrophy, which is not accomplished without optimal recuperation, they may require lower volume and frequency."
Carpinelli, who did an extensive review of the scientific literature on one set versus many, believes "the quantity of exercise is not as important as the quality of exercise." (Master Trainer, Dec. 1997).
I side with Dr. Carpinelli.

First, when you train your whole body in one workout, as I did, you simply can't do very many quality sets; there's not time or energy to do many sets of each exercise. I rarely did more than one set per exercise (after warm-up) in the eleven months before the photos were taken. What's more, as readers of my books know, I have long recommended only one or at most two work sets per exercise.
The best and most complete explanation why I generally do - and recommend - only one work set is in my book Lean For Life (beginning at page 140). But the gist of it is essentially Dr. Carpinelli's point: Quality and quantity are mutually exclusive. It is difficult, perhaps impossible, to maintain quality or intensity and do many sets. You can train hard or you can train long, but you can't do both.
Try this experiment in two separate workouts. (WARNING: Don't do this unless you are in good shape and have no health problems. If you have any doubts at all, consult your doctor.) First take Dr. Knuttgen's advice: warm up and then do 3 sets of squats "repetition maximum." Select a weight you can do about 12 reps and do three sets of as many reps as you can..

Now, about a week later try it my way: warm up well, put the same weight on the bar and do as many reps as you can, one set only. How many reps did you do? How did you feel afterward? Were you sore a few days later?

My guess is you did 2 or 3 more reps than before, even though you went for maximum reps the previous week. I'll also bet you didn't have much enthusiasm for doing another set (I know I rarely do), and that you got stiff and sore.

As I explain in Lean For Life, when you plan to do multiple work sets, consciously or subconsciously, you pace yourself; you hold back on the first set, saving your energy for the sets to follow. On the other hand, do only one set and you can focus totally on that set without thinking about the subsequent sets. You are freed up to make a better effort; you don't have to hold anything in reserve. The result is a more intense and, therefore, a more productive set. Try it and let me know your thoughts.



I do only one very hard set

Hard Intervals

My weekly aerobic workout was a modified version of the Tabata high-intensity-interval protocol discussed in articles 10, 11 and 12 on this site. I used the Schwinn Air-Dyne stationary bike, the Concept II rower or the treadmill.

As readers of "Forget The Fat-Burn Zone" (Web Article #10) will recall, Dr. Tabata's experimental group did 7 or 8 sets of high intensity intervals (20 seconds work with 10 second rest) four days per week. On the 5th day they added 30 minutes at 70% of V02max before doing 4 sets of 20 second intervals. Because I only did the protocol once a week, I included a steady-state segment along with the 20-second intervals.
After a 5-minute warm-up, I did 5 to 10 minutes at a steady pace (fast enough to be hard at the end), followed by about 5 minutes easy to recover, and then about ten 20-second intervals. I always ended with 5 minutes of cooldown.
Dr. Tabata's group did intervals at 170% of V02max, but V02max can only be measured in the laboratory. I simply experimented and found a pace that made the last interval very hard to complete. I also monitored my heart rate with the Polar chest-strap device (See The Lean Advantage 3, Chapter 6). My heart rate was usually over 90% of my measured maximum (190) at the end of the steady-state segment and again on the last 20-second interval. As my condition improved, of course, I increased the pace of the workout. (AGAIN, DON'T TRY THIS WITHOUT CHECKING WITH YOUR DOCTOR.)
Believe it or not, I came to enjoy these short - but challenging - aerobic workouts. It was not only the challenge that I liked , but the fact I only did this workout once a week. I came to each session well rested and enthusiastic. I don't believe that would've been true if I had attempted to do this very demanding protocol more often, especially when training hard with weights.
Like my whole-body weight session, I'm sticking to once-a-week aerobics. It was fun and the photos prove it worked extremely well. My body fat came down steadily, while my strength increased. Isn't that what bodybuilding is all about?
What's more, I did it at 60!
(Check back with us next month for the results of my treadmill test at the Cooper Clinic.)

Health Fitness Leanness Without Suffering - Clarence Bass

Product Catalogue | GMV Bodybuilding DVDs – Male & Female Bodybuilding DVDs – GMV Productions






































Great Expectations - Health Fitness Leanness Without Suffering - Clarence Bass

Encouragement, a reviewer wrote, is at the heart of Clarence Bass’ new book. Clarence discovered that he could look as good at 70 as he did much earlier and encourages readers to have the same great expectations for themselves—at 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, and beyond. In Great Expectations, he provides both the example and the science to show that the body will keep responding to the demands of sensible training far longer than most people think possible.

You do not have to get weaker and fatter as you age. Clarence has kept training and challenging himself. You can judge the results for yourself on our training pictorial page, which show him from 15 to 70.

Vibrant health, fitness, and leanness are there for those who choose to train, eat, and live well. What’s more, suffering is not required or even helpful. To be truly successful over the long term you must enjoy your training, diet and exercise. The details (how and why) are in Great Expectations.
Great Expectations is 163 pages (plus an 11 page preface), paperback, 9 X 6.

We stock all of Clarence’s 8 previous books, click here to see full details from our book section.
We also have the 3 Ripped DVDs which we produced in conjunction with Clarence. Please click here for details on GMV-578SPDVD.

Please click here to see a slide show of photos by  Laszlo Bencze  from the making of this latest book.
THE RIPPED COLLECTION ON DVD WITH CLARENCE BASS - 3 DVD SET Ripped 1, 2 and 3. THE RIPPED COLLECTION ON DVD WITH CLARENCE BASS - 3 DVD SET Ripped 1, 2 and 3.  
Clarence Bass has three DVDs and they are all available as a special offer. Instead of buying them separately at $34.95 each, buy all three for $94.95 - now at the SPECIAL SET PRICE OF $79.95. For a full description of each DVD please click on the links below. Clarence Bass, the living embodiment of the word "Ripped", has achieved unprecedented levels of lean muscularity through healthy living.
Winner of his height division in the "Past - 40" Mr. America and Mr. USA (and "Best Abdominals", "Best Legs" and "Most Muscular", as well), his image and his principles of diet and exercise have led people around the world to stronger and healthier lives.
GMV-578SPDVD | $94.95 $79.95