Doctor Says 20-Second Workout Can Make You Slimmer and Healthier | ABC News Blogs - Yahoo
For many of us, exercising can be a chore, but what if your workout could be over in just 20 seconds?
Dr.
Michael Mosley believes that three 20-second bursts of high-intensity
training, three times per week, can make people skinnier and healthier.
He calls the concept "fast exercise," and describes the approach in his new book, also titled "Fast Exercise."
Scroll Down to See Quick Workouts from 'Fast Exercise'
It's the latest in the apparent trend of rapid workouts. First, there was the seven-minute workout, then the four-minute plan.
ABC News correspondent Juju Chang met Mosley at Reebok Sports Club in New York to go through the paces of the routine.
Watch Dr. Mosley Explain the 'Fast Diet'
Mosley
explained that the key to effective, high intensity workouts are doing
short bursts of intense exercise. He said they seem to be much more
effective for weight loss as well as for insulin resistance.
Science
shows that what's beneficial about exercise is the stress and intensity
of the workout, not the duration, Mosley said. The benefits of this
type of exercise regimen include reduced risks of cancer and diabetes.
For Mosley, it's personal.
'Brutal' 7 Minutes a Day May Be Enough for Beach Body
"Two
years ago I discovered I was a diabetic," Mosley said. "I was a bit
overweight. That moved me into … fast exercise. And now I'm 20 pounds
lighter and my blood sugars are completely normal. I've gone from
diabetic to normal."
Mosley is also the bestselling author of "The Fast Diet,"
which outlines a weight-loss plan in which participants can eat what
they want for five days a week, but must fast for two non-consecutive
days.
As a guinea pig for his own research, Mosley says he doesn't need a fancy gym, or even gym clothes.
"Stair running is a fabulous form of exercise," he said. "You can do it in any building which has three floors."
But can a few minutes a week really work?
Daniel Rohanna teaches high-intensity workouts at Reebok. He understands that people have a lot going on in their lives.
'Greetings, Chubby Human': Weight-Loss App Shames Users
"For
a lot of people it's 'I've got kids, I've got my job, I've got to get
groceries.' It's really nice to get in, get out, hit it hard and I'm
done, but I don't think 10 minutes, three times a week is going to be
enough," he said.
Mosley said scientists all over the world are finding health benefits from doing better workouts in less time.
Try These Workouts From 'Fast Exercise'
*You should consult your physician before starting this or any exercise routine.
The Bare Minimum. 40 seconds hard exercise (2 x 20 seconds) Total - 4-6 minutes, including recovery.
Unbelievably,
there is evidence that just 40 seconds of intense activity can make a
difference. In 2011, Dr. Niels Vollaard and colleagues at Bath
University did a study in which they asked fifteen healthy but sedentary
young men and women to try something they called REHIT (reduced
exertion high-intensity training) for six weeks.
He started them
off in the first week with a couple of minutes of gentle cycling, then
one 10-second burst of intense cycling followed by a couple of minutes
of cool down. In weeks two and three, each exercise session consisted of
a warm-up, fifteen seconds of all-out sprinting, a couple of minutes of
recovery, another fifteen seconds of all-out sprinting, then the gentle
cool down.
For the final three weeks they cranked it up so each
exercise session consisted of two 20-second flat-out sprints separated
by a couple of minutes of recovery.
Despite the fact that over the
six weeks the volunteers had done less than ten minutes of hard
exercise, both the men and the women showed significant improvements in
their aerobic fitness - with a measure known as VO2max, the maximum
volume of oxygen used by the body, up 15% and 12% respectively. When it
came to insulin sensitivity, there was a gender difference: the men's
sensitivity improved by 28% while the women's did not improve.
Vollaard
is currently carrying out further studies to see if this gender
difference is real and also to see if people with metabolic syndrome and
diabetes get similar improvements.
He is also keen to investigate
in the future whether a single burst of 20 seconds done three times a
week makes a measurable difference. If you are only doing a few bursts,
20 seconds seems to be the minimum time for a burst that will make a
difference.
Extreme Weight-Loss Success Stories
The
basic principle here is to push yourself in two 20-second bursts. The
most obvious activity to choose is cycling, since that was what they did
in the trials; if you are doing it indoors, you will need an exercise
bike with variable resistance on which you can crank up the intensity
mechanically; and, if cycling outside, you will need to find a hill,
preferably quite a steep one, and use gravity to increase your workload.
But in principle, any of the activities above will work fine. In the
case of running, you will need to find some way of cranking up the
resistance for your 20-second spurts - either mechanically, on a
treadmill in the gym, or by using a hill if you are outside.
- Start off with a couple of minutes of gentle pedaling/running/swimming.
- When you feel ready, speed up and work your body as hard as you can for 20 seconds then slow down.
-
Repeat the sprint after you've had a couple of minutes of gentle
pedaling/jogging/walking to recover. Recovery time is important.
In
total, the bare minimum should take less than ten minutes. Mosely likes
to do it on an exercise bike (see box below) and, now that he's more
used to it, he does it in less than four minutes by minimizing warm-up
and cool down and by cutting his gentle pedaling to about a minute.
If
you are very unfit or have never tried HIT before, it may be worth
slowly building up the sprints from 2 x 10 seconds to 2 x 20 seconds.
Once you have mastered 2 x 20 seconds you may want to add on another
20-second sprint which, along with the recommended recovery period, will
add another couple of minutes to your regime.
First find a quiet
stairwell in a building with at least four full floors. If you are
unfit, you may want to spend a few weeks walking up the four flights
before attempting anything more adventurous.
How to Cram a Workout Into 4 Minutes
When you feel up to it, try bounding up the stairs for 20 seconds. And I mean bounding.
If you are a beginner, this should be long enough to make you breathe
heavily and to feel the buildup of fatigue in your thighs. As you get
fitter you will find that you need to run for longer, up more stairs, to
get the same feeling.
Ideally take the lift down to where you
started, or in a tall building just pause for 1-2 minutes to catch your
breath before bounding up another few floors.
The 30-Second Sprinter. 2 minutes hard exercise. Total - 16 minutes, including 14 minutes recovery
This
is similar to the 20-second sprints that we have just described, except
that you will need a longer recovery period between sprints because
going from 20 seconds to 30 seconds of all-out sprinting is much more
demanding.
If you are not used to HIT, you should start gradually,
preferably by working your way through a 20-second regime first, then
trying 2 x 30 seconds and building up from there.
Make time to do a
couple of minutes of warm-up and ensure you are mentally ready before
starting your first sprint. Between each sprint pedal gently for 3-4
minutes to recover (you will need it).
6 Ways to Work Out at Your Desk Now
This
regime is based on the original HIT studies, which were done in Canada
and were called SIT (sprint interval training). The Canadians found that
doing four 30-second sprints (interspersed with a few minutes of
recovery) three times a week led to similar improvements in fitness as
running or cycling at a steady speed for many hours a week.
30-second sprint/bike:
4 x 30-second sprints on a bike. Make time to do a couple of minutes
warm-up before starting your first sprint. Between each sprint take 3-4
minutes to recover by pedaling at a gentle pace (you will need it).
Then take at least 2 minutes to cool down.
30-second sprint/run:
4 x 30-second running sprints up a hill. Warm up by running at a gentle
pace to your chosen hill. Then sprint for 30 seconds up the hill; walk
down or around for a few minutes, then do it again. And again. And
again. Finish by jogging slowly home. Stretch if you like.
30-second sprint/swim:
If you like swimming, do the first few lengths at a gentle pace. When
you are ready, try swimming 25 meters flat out (or count to 30 in your
head). Take a bit of a breather, then continue gently swimming a couple
more lengths. Then do another sprint. Repeat four times. Finish with a
very gentle couple of lengths.
The 60-Second Workout
2½ minutes hard exercise, total - 10-11 minutes, including 8 minutes recovery
This
is one of my favorite approaches and a format I have used for many
years. It's very simple: the basic principle is to alternate 60-second
bursts of activity with 90-second recovery periods - for example, 1
minute on, 1½ minutes off. It's wonderfully flexible: it can be done
with any of the activities listed above, like cycling, running,
swimming, and can be scaled down or up according to what you require.
Woman Films Herself Through 100 Days of Workouts
You
might think that 60 seconds of HIT has to be tougher than 30 seconds,
but this version is not. The 60-second workout evolved out of work done
by the sports science team at McMaster University when they were trying
to find an effective but "gentler" version of the challenging
30-second Sprinter. The key difference is that you don't push yourself
quite as hard. Instead of going flat out, you exercise for a minute at
about 90% of your best effort, aiming to push your heart rate up to
around 80% of your maximum heart rate (see section on measuring the
impact of exercise at the back of the book) by the end of the first
minute. (To find out your HR max, see the reference section at the
back.)
In the original studies they asked the volunteers to do 10 x
1-minute bursts of HIT with 90 seconds recovery in between each burst.
This is what I do. More recently researchers from Metapredict (a group
of exercise academics) have begun testing a less demanding variant,
involving a maximum of 5 x 60-second bursts alternated with 90-second
recovery periods.
The less fit should definitely start with three
bursts; if you are super keen, and really want to push your limits, you
can do the full 10 (this is effectively the Roger Bannister version,
and particularly beneficial if you are preparing for an endurance
event). Our recommendation, if you are basically quite fit, is that you
aim for a steady five. So:
- Two minutes of warm-up.
- 5 x 60-second bursts of activity, with 90 seconds recovery between each burst.
- One minute of cool down.
The Fat Burner: 8 minutes hard exercise, total - 20 minutes, including 12 minutes recovery
This
workout involves a repetitive cycle of eight seconds of intense
activity alternated with twelve seconds of recovery, and is only really
suitable for an exercise bike. It is based on two key Australian studies
by Stephen Boutcher, which showed that HIT could lead to significant
fat loss.
After a brief warm-up, you cycle hard against resistance
for eight seconds, then gently for twelve, then hard against resistance
again for eight seconds, and gently for twelve, and so on.
Copyright
2013 by Parenting Matters Limited and Peta Bee from FASTEXERCISE
published by Atria Books, a division of Simon & Schuster, Inc.
Also Read
Showing posts with label name - michael mosely. Show all posts
Showing posts with label name - michael mosely. Show all posts
Monday, 21 April 2014
Saturday, 22 February 2014
Michael Mosley's five biggest health myths
Michael Mosley's five biggest health myths

No need to slog it out at the gym: Michael Mosley discovers the benefits of the fast fix. Photo: act\karen.hardy
Michael Mosley is arguably the most famous human-health guinea pig on the planet.
The BBC journalist, doctor and author of the best-selling 5:2
diet has been studying health and the human body for the past 20 years.
But for all his knowledge and self-experimentation, the self-confessed "sugar addict" has not been particularly healthy.

Michael Mosley
"I needed to be told I was diabetic to change, despite everything I knew," he says.
Instead of resorting to medication, Mosley decided to get drastic with his diet and see whether he could effect any change.
Turns out he could.

The Fast Diet.
Through intermittent fasting, upping his greens and shifting
the way he exercises, he has lost 12 kilograms and his blood sugar has
returned to normal. "I can fit into a dinner jacket I haven't worn since
I was 25 and I'm enjoying life," says Mosley, who was in Australia this
week to promote the release of his book in Australia as well as his new
BBC documentary series, What's Your Body Hiding.
The basic concept of intermittent fasting,where for two days of the week you restrict your calorie intake toabout 2500 kilojoules a day, is that it gives your body a break from processing food and a period where your blood is not filled with glucose.
The diet, which Mosley insists he was initially sceptical
about, is not the only interesting discovery he has made through his
research for the series.
Some of the others relate to fairly common knowledge, for
instance, that we have to drink two litres of water a day or that eggs
raise your cholesterol: "Now we know that's absolute rubbish," he says.
Other discoveries are more surprising.
We need five small meals a day
This is "completely, awfully, terribly false," Mosley says.
The idea behind eating regularly is that we speed up our
metabolic rate and prevent the body from going into starvation mode. But
the body does the opposite, he says.
The origins of this myth come from a study done in the 1950s,
when a group of young men survived on approximately half their normal
calories for six months.
They lost significant amounts of weight, but while their body
fat went down to 5 per cent they also started to experience significant
problems.
Relatively short periods of going without food, however, is a
different story, Mosley says, and can have a positive effect on us -
physiologically and psychologically.
Doctors know it all
While he was studying to become a doctor, Mosley was
surprised to hear that, within 15 years of completing his six-year
degree, half of what he had learnt would be out of date.
For this reason, he says, exempting those who are specialists
or make a concerted effort to keep abreast of the latest science, many
doctors lack knowledge in certain areas.
Nutrition and weight loss is one. In fact, he says during his
years of training he was required to attend just one class on
nutrition.
Despite this, and although some doctors are open-minded about
the latest research, "some are happy to pontificate about subjects they
know nothing about".
He mentions one study comparing various methods of weight
reduction where the group who received advice from their GP actually put
on weight.
Sugar is the devil in disguise
In a media briefing this week, Mosley said he disagreed with the stance of I Quit Sugar author and host of the event, Sarah Wilson.
"Sugar is one of my greatest addictions," he acknowledges.
"Pretty much every tooth in my mouth has been drilled and replaced. If
there's chocolate or biscuits in the house, I'll eat them."
In this sense, he says: "I do generally agree that we eat far too much of it."
That said, he feels sugar has become a "massive thing" and is wary of being "evangelical" about it.
"Do we know that fructose is as demonising as we say? No, the evidence is contradictory."
Besides, he believes it's not about completely avoiding
foods, but forgiving yourself when you do falter, being aware of the
impact of certain foods and "knowing you'll be constantly tempted and
finding strategies around it".
Mosley's strategy involves no longer keeping biscuits or chocolate in the house.
Exercise is the best way to lose weight
"Exercise is a bad form of weight loss," Mosley says, pointing to research on compensatory eating and relaxing, where "basically you're knackered, so you sit down" for the rest of the day.
The problem with people believing that exercise is a good way
to lose weight is that they get disenchanted and stop doing it, he
explains.
This doesn't mean we shouldn't exercise.
According to Mosley, the real benefits are the effect
exercise has on insulin sensitivity and aerobic fitness. "Which means a
longer and healthier life," he says.
There's "preliminary" research that high-intensity interval
training burns more fat, so "you will look more gorgeous at the beach".
But for those who don't do the recommended daily amount of
exercise – about 80 per cent of Australians – Mosley wanted to know
"what's the least you can probably do".
"One of the gurus I spoke to said you can get most of the
benefits from three minutes a week," he says. "I was absolutely
sceptical about it."
Mosley now does a short, sharp workout, pushing as hard as he
can for 20 seconds, taking a break and repeating. The entire thing
takes him a measly four minutes.
The effects of these quick hits of exercise persist for up to 36 hours after, he says.
Mosley has also increased his incidental activity. Just
taking the stairs and getting up regularly has a surprising impact on
fat and blood sugar levels.
"We need to move every 30 minutes," he says. "Get off your arse and go for a short stroll."
Everyone needs to eat breakfast
Not true, Mosley says.
He mentions studies where some people, when they are forced
to eat breakfast, actually put on weight. "It depends on what your body
likes to do," he says.
Which is why Mosley ultimately believes in becoming your own
guinea pig. Depending on our own physical make-up and routine, we reap
benefits differently. It's a matter of absorbing the information and
trying it on for size.
But if you're making a change or trying to break a bad habit, don't expect to be transformed within 21 days.
"That's completely made up," Mosley says. "I've looked into it."
What’s Your Body Hiding? season, from October 6 on BBC Knowledge
No need to slog it out at the gym: Michael Mosley discovers the benefits of the fast fix. Photo: act\karen.hardy
The BBC journalist, doctor and author of the best-selling 5:2
diet has been studying health and the human body for the past 20 years.
But for all his knowledge and self-experimentation, the self-confessed "sugar addict" has not been particularly healthy.
Michael Mosley
Instead of resorting to medication, Mosley decided to get drastic with his diet and see whether he could effect any change.
Turns out he could.
The Fast Diet.
the way he exercises, he has lost 12 kilograms and his blood sugar has
returned to normal. "I can fit into a dinner jacket I haven't worn since
I was 25 and I'm enjoying life," says Mosley, who was in Australia this
week to promote the release of his book in Australia as well as his new
BBC documentary series, What's Your Body Hiding.
The basic concept of intermittent fasting,where for two days of the week you restrict your calorie intake toabout 2500 kilojoules a day, is that it gives your body a break from processing food and a period where your blood is not filled with glucose.
The diet, which Mosley insists he was initially sceptical
about, is not the only interesting discovery he has made through his
research for the series.
Some of the others relate to fairly common knowledge, for
instance, that we have to drink two litres of water a day or that eggs
raise your cholesterol: "Now we know that's absolute rubbish," he says.
Other discoveries are more surprising.
We need five small meals a day
This is "completely, awfully, terribly false," Mosley says.
The idea behind eating regularly is that we speed up our
metabolic rate and prevent the body from going into starvation mode. But
the body does the opposite, he says.
The origins of this myth come from a study done in the 1950s,
when a group of young men survived on approximately half their normal
calories for six months.
They lost significant amounts of weight, but while their body
fat went down to 5 per cent they also started to experience significant
problems.
Relatively short periods of going without food, however, is a
different story, Mosley says, and can have a positive effect on us -
physiologically and psychologically.
Doctors know it all
While he was studying to become a doctor, Mosley was
surprised to hear that, within 15 years of completing his six-year
degree, half of what he had learnt would be out of date.
For this reason, he says, exempting those who are specialists
or make a concerted effort to keep abreast of the latest science, many
doctors lack knowledge in certain areas.
Nutrition and weight loss is one. In fact, he says during his
years of training he was required to attend just one class on
nutrition.
Despite this, and although some doctors are open-minded about
the latest research, "some are happy to pontificate about subjects they
know nothing about".
He mentions one study comparing various methods of weight
reduction where the group who received advice from their GP actually put
on weight.
Sugar is the devil in disguise
In a media briefing this week, Mosley said he disagreed with the stance of I Quit Sugar author and host of the event, Sarah Wilson.
"Sugar is one of my greatest addictions," he acknowledges.
"Pretty much every tooth in my mouth has been drilled and replaced. If
there's chocolate or biscuits in the house, I'll eat them."
In this sense, he says: "I do generally agree that we eat far too much of it."
That said, he feels sugar has become a "massive thing" and is wary of being "evangelical" about it.
"Do we know that fructose is as demonising as we say? No, the evidence is contradictory."
Besides, he believes it's not about completely avoiding
foods, but forgiving yourself when you do falter, being aware of the
impact of certain foods and "knowing you'll be constantly tempted and
finding strategies around it".
Mosley's strategy involves no longer keeping biscuits or chocolate in the house.
Exercise is the best way to lose weight
"Exercise is a bad form of weight loss," Mosley says, pointing to research on compensatory eating and relaxing, where "basically you're knackered, so you sit down" for the rest of the day.
The problem with people believing that exercise is a good way
to lose weight is that they get disenchanted and stop doing it, he
explains.
This doesn't mean we shouldn't exercise.
According to Mosley, the real benefits are the effect
exercise has on insulin sensitivity and aerobic fitness. "Which means a
longer and healthier life," he says.
There's "preliminary" research that high-intensity interval
training burns more fat, so "you will look more gorgeous at the beach".
But for those who don't do the recommended daily amount of
exercise – about 80 per cent of Australians – Mosley wanted to know
"what's the least you can probably do".
"One of the gurus I spoke to said you can get most of the
benefits from three minutes a week," he says. "I was absolutely
sceptical about it."
Mosley now does a short, sharp workout, pushing as hard as he
can for 20 seconds, taking a break and repeating. The entire thing
takes him a measly four minutes.
The effects of these quick hits of exercise persist for up to 36 hours after, he says.
Mosley has also increased his incidental activity. Just
taking the stairs and getting up regularly has a surprising impact on
fat and blood sugar levels.
"We need to move every 30 minutes," he says. "Get off your arse and go for a short stroll."
Everyone needs to eat breakfast
Not true, Mosley says.
He mentions studies where some people, when they are forced
to eat breakfast, actually put on weight. "It depends on what your body
likes to do," he says.
Which is why Mosley ultimately believes in becoming your own
guinea pig. Depending on our own physical make-up and routine, we reap
benefits differently. It's a matter of absorbing the information and
trying it on for size.
But if you're making a change or trying to break a bad habit, don't expect to be transformed within 21 days.
"That's completely made up," Mosley says. "I've looked into it."
What’s Your Body Hiding? season, from October 6 on BBC Knowledge
Eat light, pedal fast - Michael Mosley: The Science Show - ABC Radio National (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Michael Mosley: eat light, pedal fast - The Science Show - ABC Radio National (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Michael Mosley: eat light, pedal fast
- Saturday 19 October 2013 12:47PM
Michael Mosley is a journalist, physician, producer and television
presenter. He has produced television programs where he is the guinea
pig. In Eat, Fast And Live Longer, he experiments with a simple
diet which has people eating lightly 2 days each week. For him, it
worked well, perhaps too well. He lost 12Kg and has now modified the
diet to eating lightly 1 day each week. But there are other benefits in
addition to weight loss. The diet helps cholesterol and can eliminate
diabetes. In The Truth About Exercise, Mosley discovers the
benefits of exercise can be found in short bursts of high intensity
exertion, rather than hours slogging on treadmills or running.
presenter. He has produced television programs where he is the guinea
pig. In Eat, Fast And Live Longer, he experiments with a simple
diet which has people eating lightly 2 days each week. For him, it
worked well, perhaps too well. He lost 12Kg and has now modified the
diet to eating lightly 1 day each week. But there are other benefits in
addition to weight loss. The diet helps cholesterol and can eliminate
diabetes. In The Truth About Exercise, Mosley discovers the
benefits of exercise can be found in short bursts of high intensity
exertion, rather than hours slogging on treadmills or running.
A few short, intensive bursts of exercise each week can bring dramatic benefits.
Michael Mosley is on the fast track to fitness | The AustralianThe Australian
January 18, 2014
Michael Mosley says a few short, intensive bursts of exercise each week can bring dramatic benefits.
A YEAR ago I wrote a book that changed my life. A middle-aged
medical journalist, I found myself the unlikely author of an
international bestseller, The Fast Diet, and the recipient of a lot of grateful emails.
Now I'm hoping to do it again with Fast Exercise. Fast Exercise is
based on a surprising and radical claim - that you can get fitter,
healthier and better toned with just a few minutes of intense exercise a
day, three days a week.
For those who missed it, the Fast Diet - often known as "the 5:2" -
is based on the idea of intermittent fasting,
also known as IF. Instead of aiming for slow, steady calorie
restriction - the approach recommended by sensible dietitians that most
people find impossible to stick to - with IF you slash your calories,
but for only a couple of days a week (hence the catchphrase the 5:2).
Although it may sound faddish, intermittent fasting is based on careful
scientific studies (mainly animal, but some human) that suggest it not
only leads to weight loss but has multiple other health benefits.
I was convinced enough by the science to make a documentary and then
to write a book. I remember, shortly after we delivered the manuscript a
year ago, pointing out to my co-author, Mimi Spencer, that there are
about 50,000 diet books available online and the odds of us making an
impact were, to say the least, slim. Mimi, who is an incurably
optimistic Tigger to my Eeyore, was convinced we would succeed because
our approach was offering not just a science-based diet but a modern
take on an old tradition. Fasting, after all, has a long history. "It
will be huge," she announced, as we sipped our calorie-free tea. She was
right. As well as numerous doctors, politicians and a Nobel
prizewinner, there have been endorsements from the likes of food writer
Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall and actor Benedict Cumberbatch.
One of the most striking things about the Fast Diet is how many men not only
embrace it but are happy to tell the world they are doing it. I think it
helps that "fasting" sounds challenging. It is also simple and
straightforward, which again seems to appeal to men. Mimi's father is
certainly a poster boy for this approach. Over the past few months he
has lost more than 16kg and has had to buy new trousers. This is
something I can identify with as I have lost 10kg, a few inches around
my middle and found that most of my clothes no longer fit. I hate
shopping but fortunately I have sons whose clothes I can now borrow (I
haven't told them). I'm also wearing suits from 20 years ago that I
never got around to throwing out.
Although I'm pleased with the weight loss, for me intermittent
fasting was never about getting slimmer.
Eighteen months ago I went to my GP with a suspicious mole and
she suggested I have my blood tested. The mole turned out to be benign
but the blood results were not. I had a fasting glucose of 7.3 mmol/l,
which made me diabetic, and a "bad" cholesterol (LDL) of 5.5 mmol/l (the
recommended level is less than 3). I shouldn't have been surprised
because my father, who struggled with his weight all his life, died of
complications from diabetes in his early 70s. I'd never felt the need to
diet because I had never seen myself as overweight. Yes, I weighed in
at 85kg, but when I looked in the mirror I saw someone slim, ageing
well, almost athletic. This wasn't simply a case of middle-aged
delusion; the surplus fat really was invisible. My fat wasn't sitting
under my skin, bulging out in unseemly places. It was visceral fat,
buried deep inside my body. I went for an MRI and saw not just the odd
dab but litres of the stuff inside my abdomen, coating and clogging my
internal organs. Visceral fat is particularly unhealthy because it is
metabolically active, increasing your risk of diabetes and heart
disease. It is surprisingly common, even in people of normal weight.
Rather than start on a conventional diet, I decided to try intermittent
fasting. Unlike proper, hardcore fasting where you live for days or even
weeks on few if any calories, IF involves a few days a week when you
eat about a quarter of your normal calories. Being a television
presenter with a taste for self-experimentation, I naturally made a
documentary about my adventures. In the course of making Eat, Fast, Live Longer I
came across different ways you can do intermittent fasting. The
best-studied approach and the one that is likely to lead to the most
rapid weight loss is ADF, alternate day fasting. As the name implies,
you cut your calories every other day. I tried ADF but found it hard
going and settled instead on a 5:2 pattern, cutting my calories two days
a week. If you don't splurge on your non-fast days then this should
lead to a weight loss of almost half a kilogram a week.
Dr Michelle Harvie and Professor Tony Howell of the Genesis Breast Cancer
Prevention Centre, who have done proper clinical studies comparing two
days a week of calorie restriction against a standard diet, found that
those on the two-day diet lost nearly twice as much fat (about 4kg) as
those on a standard diet, as well as seeing greater improvements in key
biochemical markers such as insulin sensitivity. Intermittent fasting
won't suit everyone, but it worked for me. Not only did I lose a lot of
fat (10cm off my waist, 5cm off my neck) but I also saw huge
improvements in my fasting glucose and cholesterol levels, both of which
are now in the healthy range.
Yet even when I was doing IF I knewit was not enough.
I realised that if I was going to maximise my
chances of living into a healthy old age then I needed to do more
exercise. The trouble is I hate running, jogging or going to the gym.
Instead, I've taken up a very different approach, pioneered by (among
others) Professor Jamie Timmons of Loughborough University. Jamie
introduced me to HIT, high intensity training. Like IF, HIT is a radical
solution to a modern problem, in this case how to get the most from a
workout in the least possible time. HIT also eschews the "moderation in
all things" approach. Instead of plodding away on a treadmill or cycling
at a steady, sensible pace, with HIT you do a few extremely short
bursts of exercise, intense enough to get your heart rate soaring,
interspersed with a couple of minutes of recovery. A few such bursts
(lasting anywhere between 20 seconds and one minute) done three times a
week can produce dramatic changes. Numerous trials have shown that HIT
not only makes people aerobically fitter in a remarkably short time but
also metabolically fitter. In particular, it improves the body's ability
to process the glucose surge you get after a meal. As someone with a
genetic propensity to develop diabetes, this is particularly important.
Early versions of HIT were tough, best suited to those who were already
athletic. Modified versions have recently been tested on people who are
older, heavier and in less good health, such as those with heart
disease. Done properly it is safe, effective and surprisingly enjoyable.
It burns more fat than conventional exercise and, best of all, it's
over in less time than it takes to drive to the gym. A self-confessed
couch potato, I've been doing short versions of high-intensity training
for almost a year, with impressive results. During that time I teamed up
with journalist Peta Bee. Despite the fact that we have very different
attitudes to exercise (she loves it, I loathe it) and she started out
super-fit (I wasn't), we bonded over a mutual enthusiasm for HIT. We
hope HIT will be a hit.
January 18, 2014
Michael Mosley says a few short, intensive bursts of exercise each week can bring dramatic benefits.
A YEAR ago I wrote a book that changed my life. A middle-aged
medical journalist, I found myself the unlikely author of an
international bestseller, The Fast Diet, and the recipient of a lot of grateful emails.
based on a surprising and radical claim - that you can get fitter,
healthier and better toned with just a few minutes of intense exercise a
day, three days a week.
For those who missed it, the Fast Diet - often known as "the 5:2" -
is based on the idea of intermittent fasting,
also known as IF. Instead of aiming for slow, steady calorie
restriction - the approach recommended by sensible dietitians that most
people find impossible to stick to - with IF you slash your calories,
but for only a couple of days a week (hence the catchphrase the 5:2).
Although it may sound faddish, intermittent fasting is based on careful
scientific studies (mainly animal, but some human) that suggest it not
only leads to weight loss but has multiple other health benefits.
I was convinced enough by the science to make a documentary and then
to write a book. I remember, shortly after we delivered the manuscript a
year ago, pointing out to my co-author, Mimi Spencer, that there are
about 50,000 diet books available online and the odds of us making an
impact were, to say the least, slim. Mimi, who is an incurably
optimistic Tigger to my Eeyore, was convinced we would succeed because
our approach was offering not just a science-based diet but a modern
take on an old tradition. Fasting, after all, has a long history. "It
will be huge," she announced, as we sipped our calorie-free tea. She was
right. As well as numerous doctors, politicians and a Nobel
prizewinner, there have been endorsements from the likes of food writer
Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall and actor Benedict Cumberbatch.
One of the most striking things about the Fast Diet is how many men not only
embrace it but are happy to tell the world they are doing it. I think it
helps that "fasting" sounds challenging. It is also simple and
straightforward, which again seems to appeal to men. Mimi's father is
certainly a poster boy for this approach. Over the past few months he
has lost more than 16kg and has had to buy new trousers. This is
something I can identify with as I have lost 10kg, a few inches around
my middle and found that most of my clothes no longer fit. I hate
shopping but fortunately I have sons whose clothes I can now borrow (I
haven't told them). I'm also wearing suits from 20 years ago that I
never got around to throwing out.
Although I'm pleased with the weight loss, for me intermittent
fasting was never about getting slimmer.
Eighteen months ago I went to my GP with a suspicious mole and
she suggested I have my blood tested. The mole turned out to be benign
but the blood results were not. I had a fasting glucose of 7.3 mmol/l,
which made me diabetic, and a "bad" cholesterol (LDL) of 5.5 mmol/l (the
recommended level is less than 3). I shouldn't have been surprised
because my father, who struggled with his weight all his life, died of
complications from diabetes in his early 70s. I'd never felt the need to
diet because I had never seen myself as overweight. Yes, I weighed in
at 85kg, but when I looked in the mirror I saw someone slim, ageing
well, almost athletic. This wasn't simply a case of middle-aged
delusion; the surplus fat really was invisible. My fat wasn't sitting
under my skin, bulging out in unseemly places. It was visceral fat,
buried deep inside my body. I went for an MRI and saw not just the odd
dab but litres of the stuff inside my abdomen, coating and clogging my
internal organs. Visceral fat is particularly unhealthy because it is
metabolically active, increasing your risk of diabetes and heart
disease. It is surprisingly common, even in people of normal weight.
Rather than start on a conventional diet, I decided to try intermittent
fasting. Unlike proper, hardcore fasting where you live for days or even
weeks on few if any calories, IF involves a few days a week when you
eat about a quarter of your normal calories. Being a television
presenter with a taste for self-experimentation, I naturally made a
documentary about my adventures. In the course of making Eat, Fast, Live Longer I
came across different ways you can do intermittent fasting. The
best-studied approach and the one that is likely to lead to the most
rapid weight loss is ADF, alternate day fasting. As the name implies,
you cut your calories every other day. I tried ADF but found it hard
going and settled instead on a 5:2 pattern, cutting my calories two days
a week. If you don't splurge on your non-fast days then this should
lead to a weight loss of almost half a kilogram a week.
Dr Michelle Harvie and Professor Tony Howell of the Genesis Breast Cancer
Prevention Centre, who have done proper clinical studies comparing two
days a week of calorie restriction against a standard diet, found that
those on the two-day diet lost nearly twice as much fat (about 4kg) as
those on a standard diet, as well as seeing greater improvements in key
biochemical markers such as insulin sensitivity. Intermittent fasting
won't suit everyone, but it worked for me. Not only did I lose a lot of
fat (10cm off my waist, 5cm off my neck) but I also saw huge
improvements in my fasting glucose and cholesterol levels, both of which
are now in the healthy range.
Yet even when I was doing IF I knewit was not enough.
I realised that if I was going to maximise my
chances of living into a healthy old age then I needed to do more
exercise. The trouble is I hate running, jogging or going to the gym.
Instead, I've taken up a very different approach, pioneered by (among
others) Professor Jamie Timmons of Loughborough University. Jamie
introduced me to HIT, high intensity training. Like IF, HIT is a radical
solution to a modern problem, in this case how to get the most from a
workout in the least possible time. HIT also eschews the "moderation in
all things" approach. Instead of plodding away on a treadmill or cycling
at a steady, sensible pace, with HIT you do a few extremely short
bursts of exercise, intense enough to get your heart rate soaring,
interspersed with a couple of minutes of recovery. A few such bursts
(lasting anywhere between 20 seconds and one minute) done three times a
week can produce dramatic changes. Numerous trials have shown that HIT
not only makes people aerobically fitter in a remarkably short time but
also metabolically fitter. In particular, it improves the body's ability
to process the glucose surge you get after a meal. As someone with a
genetic propensity to develop diabetes, this is particularly important.
Early versions of HIT were tough, best suited to those who were already
athletic. Modified versions have recently been tested on people who are
older, heavier and in less good health, such as those with heart
disease. Done properly it is safe, effective and surprisingly enjoyable.
It burns more fat than conventional exercise and, best of all, it's
over in less time than it takes to drive to the gym. A self-confessed
couch potato, I've been doing short versions of high-intensity training
for almost a year, with impressive results. During that time I teamed up
with journalist Peta Bee. Despite the fact that we have very different
attitudes to exercise (she loves it, I loathe it) and she started out
super-fit (I wasn't), we bonded over a mutual enthusiasm for HIT. We
hope HIT will be a hit.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)