Saturday, 9 February 2013

I No Longer Give a Squat About The Squat | Critical MAS

I No Longer Give a Squat About The Squat | Critical MAS

I No Longer Give a Squat About The Squat

Last year I said my goodbyes to the classic weight lifting exercise the bench press in the post My Bench Press Sucks and I Don’t Care. In that post I listed 5 reasons why I no longer do the bench press. In this post, I will say my official goodbye to the most sacred exercise of them all: the squat. I actually stopped doing squats years ago.

The benefits I received in the early years of squatting were eventually replaced with injuries and back pain. Over time I stopped squatting as a pain avoidance strategy. When I did squat, I lowered the weight and did fewer reps and sets. I often felt guilty about feeling too broken to squat.

Anthony Dream Johnson just posted an outstanding blog post titled Barbell Squat: the Worst Exercise in Existence? I highly recommend reading it and watching the accompanying video. Anthony goes into the bio-mechanics and risks of spinal loading using ideas from works of Bill DeSimone. It is all great information.
Now I am going to explain how I arrived at the same conclusion.

Why Did We Start Squatting?

When we first start a weight lifting program our primary motivation is to build muscle. We then quickly learn that the squat is the most anabolic exercise one can perform in the free weight room. This is likely true. Books have been written on the squat, so there is clearly something to this exercise, especially for the untrained beginner. Not only will it make your legs stronger, but all your muscles will grow.

The problem with the squat was stated clearly in Anthony’s video. The muscles in the legs will get stronger at a much faster rate than the muscles supporting the spinal column that are being compressed during a squat motion. This is exactly what I experienced. When my squat went from 115 pounds to 275 pounds, I felt great. My legs got much stronger and I gained muscle. Then came the injuries. The result was years of back pain and scaling back on the squat in frequency, weight and volume.


My old home gym back in my squat days. 

The Myth of the Perfect Rep

I can already hear the critics that say that if one chooses a safe weight and your form is perfect then injuries are unlikely. The CrossFit crowd says the same thing. “If only” we choose a safe weight. “If only” we pick the exact number of repetitions or sets. “If only” our form is perfect every time. But not every rep is perfect – even in elite Olympic athletes. We get emotional. We add too much weight, do one too many reps or rush back to the gym before we’ve fully recovered from a prior workout. We get injured. We age.

Compound movements that use high amounts of weight and demand perfect form put the individual at greater risk of injury when that form is compromised. And fatigue is a factor in compromised form. The stakes are low when we first start squatting, because the weight usually isn’t significant. As we get stronger and the weight gets heavier, the risks begin to exceed the benefits. That is my opinion. As a 6 foot 3 inch ectomorph, the risks exceeded the benefits as I approached 300 pounds. For a short young endomorph that number might be higher.

Gym Survivorship

I’m going to go back to a point that I often make on this blog: survivorship bias. I started lifting weights in 1994. Since then I’ve lifted in many gyms across 5 states. Every single one of them had guys squatting serious weights. I would estimate that 98-99% of all the lifters that I’ve seen squatting more than body weight are under 35 years old. This ratio has held true every year since I began lifting weights. I suspect it will continue to be true.

Where have all the old squatters gone? Those 30 year old guys that were squatting double their body weight 10 or 15 years ago are gone. They’ve been replaced with another generation of young lifters. People do not voluntarily en mass quit activities that they demonstrate excellence in performing. No matter how busy life gets, someone that has worked up to a double body weight squat doesn’t just walk away from the iron game without a reason. I believe that reason is pain and injuries. They’ve been removed from the pool so we don’t see those failures.
Ed Coan Squat Injury 2002

The Squat Axiom

I know I will receive some negative feedback for this post. The critics will point to the successful and then try to extrapolate back to justify the squat. My finance background forces me to look at the problem differently.
[A] A high percentage of muscular and healthy individuals at the gym built their physique using squats.
[B] A high percentage of individuals at the gym that regularly performed squats are muscular and healthy.
I believe A is true and B is false. Humans are blinded by successful outcomes and we ignore the failures. We shouldn’t be looking for the exercise that produces the most successful outcomes without examining the downside risks. We should be seeking the exercise that produces the most positive results with the lowest failure rate.

A Better Way Forward

What is the point of being brawny at 30 and broken at 40? For me fitness is not a point in time and I don’t need to impress the bros at the gym with my squat numbers. My goal is to increase strength while doing everything in my power to reduce the risk of injury. That will be the topic of my next post. I will outline a few exercises I’ve used to transition away from the barbell back squat. My back has been thanking me every since.

My Bench Press Sucks and I Don’t Care | Critical MAS

My Bench Press Sucks and I Don’t Care | Critical MAS

My Bench Press Sucks and I Don’t Care

I’m going to share my dark embarrassing secret. My bench press sucks!
Since I started lifting weights in 1994, there have only been three periods where I could bench more than my weight. And then I could only muster up an extra 10 or so more pounds. Until recently this has always bothered me a little. How much a man can bench press has for longest time been one of the three metrics for success in the gym. The other two being the squat and dead lift.

In the article Are You Strong? author and fitness professional Tim Henriques makes the case that a decent bench press is 225 pounds or 1.25 times body weight. Achieving a good bench press requires 315 pounds or 1.5 times body weight. This means that for vast majority of the time I’ve been lifting weights, I’ve been less than decent. This used to bother me. Not anymore.

Why I No Longer Care About the Bench Press

#1 Accepting my Somatype

I am 6 foot and 2.5 inches tall (189 cm). My arms are long and my wrists are small. I am an ectomorph. Ectomorphs across the board suck at the bench press. We have greater weak points in the movement. Shorter guys excel at this movement, as do men with thick wrists.

Back when I was a member of a hard core gym in South Tampa, the guys that could bench 400+ pounds were all under 5′ 10 and had stocky builds. Seeing a true ectomorph bench more than his weight after college is a rare site.

#2 Understanding that the Bench Press is a Technical Move

The bench press isn’t just a way to develop strength. It is a technical movement. The goal is to lower and lift as much weight as possible without hurting yourself. Although the primary muscle being targeted is the pectoralis major, the bench press will also target the anterior deltoids, serratus anterior, coracobrachialis, scapulae fixers, trapezii, and the triceps. Each muscle has a limiting factor. Getting them all to work together to share the load via form and timing isn’t just about having more strength. Like any sport, one needs to train the movement itself.

That may all seem like common sense, but the reason many men go to the gym in the first place is to build muscle, not have a better bench press. We later – falsely – draw the conclusion that in order to have more chest muscle we need to have a greater bench press. I care about muscle, not bragging rights to some number.

#3 Embracing The Negative

One of the aspects of High Intensity Training that I’ve learned to love is the focus on negatives. By slowing down the lowering of the weight, you will recruit more muscle and fatigue much faster. From Negative Training for Positive Results by Dave Durell:
During the negative, or lowering, phase of a repetition, the muscle fibers involved are lengthening under tension. Your muscles are much stronger during this phase than during the positive, or lifting phase. Even when you reach positive failure during an exercise, and can no longer lift a certain weight with good form, the truth is there is still a lot of strength left in that muscle. Negative training allows you to tap into that unused strength, overloading the muscle at a much deeper level, and stimulating it to respond by growing bigger and stronger.
This type of overload has tremendous strength and muscle building properties. It is possible to get VERY big and strong VERY quickly with negative only training.
In order to get a higher bench press number, you’ll want to avoid negative fatigue so you have enough strength to safely complete the positive portion. So if my choice is to slow the negative portion of the lift using a lower weight or having a higher bench press number with less muscle recruitment, I’ll take the lower number.

#4 Avoiding Injury

To get good at the bench press, you need to bench press a lot. This brings us back to our old friend survivorship bias. I see lots of guys in the 20s slamming serious weights. I see a few guys doing it in their 30s. Where are the 40-60 year old guys at? Occasionally I’ll see one, but it is a rare site. Where did all those guys that had amazing bench press numbers 10-20 years ago go? I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: People do not en masse voluntarily quit participating in something for which they are highly skilled doing. What happened?

The fitness websites are filled with reports if injuries related to bench pressing. The body doesn’t have an unlimited capacity for recovery. And because the bench press is a technical move, being off a few inches or a second in timing can result in injury.

#5 The Modern Gym

Assume that I changed my opinion about the bench press and my goal was to get decent or even good at it. To be safe, I would need to have a spotter. Back in the pre-iPod days, guys in the free weight room acknowledged each other. Sometimes they even spoke to one another. Real conservation! We asked for spots and we offered them. Not anymore. I haven’t been asked for a spot in over 5 years now.
Gym walls today have flat screen TVs showing sports highlights and MSNBC. Back in the day, the walls displayed photos of Frank Zane and Arnold. The free weight rooms went from a group of fellow lifters helping each other out to a room full of iPod wearing, TV watching zombies. Even if asking for a spot wasn’t considered old timey 20th century behavior, I wouldn’t trust anyone in the modern gym for a safe spot and that includes the staff.

Life After The Bench Press

I’ve done thousands bench press repetitions. Although it did help me gain some muscle, it also resulted in a rounded mid back and contributed to my wrist surgery. Was there a better, safer way to develop chest muscles? I now think so.

In the past year, I have done High Intensity Training using Super Slow and static hold movements with machines. No more free weights. No more bench presses. For the first time in years, I actually gained new muscle. And I didn’t have to beat my body senseless to earn it.
How much can I bench press? I don’t know and I don’t care.

Frank Medrano - body weight exercises, displaying incredible strength feats


Uploaded on 3 Dec 2011
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Frank-...
^^^LIKE my Facebook for more INFO and MOTIVATION!!

Frank Medrano displaying incredible strength feats, Cut and ripped muscle.
Checkout Frank Medrano's interview with CutAndJacked.com here: http://www.cutandjacked.com/CutAndJac... and like on facebook at: http://www.facebook.com/CutAndJacked

Wednesday, 6 February 2013

Heavy Weights Low Reps, somewhat – 180 Degree Health

Heavy Weights Low Reps – 180 Degree Health

In sum:

1.)Infrequent, heavy weight, low rep training is mostly for limit (max ) strength. It will NOT put significant muscle mass on most individuals. (There are people who current “needs state” coincides with such training in terms of hypertrophy. This is only true if this approach is part of proper progressive programing that involved other forms of training).

2.) Intensity, reps higher than 5, moderate weights, multiple sets and consistency: This will generally lead to at least some development for most people; more so than heavy weights, low reps or HIT generally will.

3.) However, for long term, significant cosmetic gains, proper progressive programing is key; some people have an instinctive feel for this, others can teach themselves this over time, still others will need to hire a knowledgeable coach.

4.) It is simply not true not true at all that people with a history of low metabolism and low work capacity are forever stuck doing some half-assed infrequent, once or twice per for week heavy weight, low rep scheme. Proper programing can improve their health and work capacity, as the example of “Joe” demonstrates.

5.) To emphasize to the point of overreaching redundancy: Proper programing is key!

Reply
Matt Stone
Thanks DML. As you probably know I’ve discussed all this in the past and hit (pun intended) all of the major points you mentioned with a hearty Scott Abel endorsement.

I think each form of training has its pros and cons. The drawbacks of Abel’s approach is the complexity, the intensity, the frequency, and the duration. Even if I felt I could recover properly from it and still make progress, that doesn’t mean I would have the willpower to keep facing grueling workouts day in and day out. I can’t even stick with HIT because it’s too taxing.

I just don’t have it in me. So conversations about less than ideal forms of exercise that are efficient and still effective (the limit strength increases I’m currently seeing were unimaginable to me two months ago before I began doing static holds with maximal weight) are happening.

Thanks for your input.

Heavy resistance, low reps. That’s the right direction! – 180 Degree Health

Heavy Weights Low Reps – 180 Degree Health

Lars

Finally!

Heavy resistance, low reps. That’s the right direction!

I’m 37 now ( male ), my whole life I did all kinds of sports / training / exercise. The low-carb-paleo-shit a few years ago led to my metabolic breakdown. Nothing new here, I know :-) Finally this experience brought me to 180D :-)

Since my breakdown I was always trying to find the perfect workout, studied all kinds of exercise obsessively. What’s the holy grail? What is the training a person with a damaged metabolism / health can tolerate? Better; what training can lead to significant strength gains – without drawbacks? Yeah, I was just like Matt: Not reading few hundreds books about medicine, health, nutrition – but exercise. I’m serious, my bookshelf looks like the sports book warehouse from Amazon…

The answer? It’s individual ( what a surprise!!! ). Highly individual.

For me it’s definitely the “classic strength training approach”. Never more than 5 reps – if any. The last few months I was experimenting with isometric exercises exclusively – with incredible results.

I think one of the main problems is that most people approach exercise from a cosmetic viewpoint. That’s wrong. It’s as wrong as to approach nutrition from a cosmetic viewpoint.

People want muscles, they don’t realize that strength comes first.
Train for strength! Everything else comes naturally!

On the other hand, most people are far too focused on lifting weights and finding a gym. That’s ridiculous. It’s like thinking that you have to own a Ferrari to use the highway.

You can have extremely effective and progressive workouts using bodyweight only. Your body is your gym. That’s not exaggerated.

I recommend a gymnastic oriented strength training. You can’t go wrong. And very important: It can be real fun!